ALAR vs. DECK
ALAR (Alarum Technologies Ltd.) and DECK (Deckers Outdoor Corporation) are both stocks. ALAR operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while DECK operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, ALAR returned -9.94%/yr vs 15.25%/yr for DECK. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ALAR vs. DECK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALAR achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly higher than DECK's 5.85% return.
ALAR
- 1D
- 7.74%
- 1M
- 15.80%
- YTD
- 11.89%
- 6M
- 20.60%
- 1Y
- 18.37%
- 3Y*
- 59.63%
- 5Y*
- -9.94%
- 10Y*
- —
DECK
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 5.85%
- 6M
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- 0.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.47%
- 5Y*
- 15.25%
- 10Y*
- 28.25%
ALAR vs. DECK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALAR Alarum Technologies Ltd. | 11.89% | -19.13% | 36.73% | 223.33% | -66.20% | -50.00% | -53.14% | -94.90% | -80.59% |
DECK Deckers Outdoor Corporation | 5.85% | -48.95% | 82.30% | 67.46% | 8.97% | 27.73% | 69.83% | 31.97% | 10.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALAR and DECK is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2018 | 0.16 |
The correlation between ALAR and DECK shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.20 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ALAR:
$56.93M
DECK:
$15.53B
ALAR:
$0.15
DECK:
$6.98
ALAR:
63.27
DECK:
15.72
ALAR:
0.19
DECK:
0.57
ALAR:
1.60
DECK:
2.94
ALAR:
1.71
DECK:
6.21
ALAR:
$45.33M
DECK:
$5.47B
ALAR:
$26.25M
DECK:
$3.16B
ALAR:
$2.16M
DECK:
$1.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALAR vs. DECK — Risk / Return Rank
ALAR
DECK
ALAR vs. DECK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alarum Technologies Ltd. (ALAR) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALAR | DECK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.04 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 0.01 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.45 | 0.03 | +0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALAR | DECK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 0.01 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.35 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.50 | 0.24 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
ALAR vs. DECK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALAR drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than DECK's maximum drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAR and DECK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALAR | DECK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.95% | -94.36% | -5.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.10% | -35.81% | -31.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.82% | -64.35% | -23.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.44% | -64.35% | -26.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.69% | -50.82% | -48.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -95.63% | -40.35% | -55.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.31% | 16.94% | +24.37% |
Volatility
ALAR vs. DECK - Volatility Comparison
Alarum Technologies Ltd. (ALAR) has a higher volatility of 35.72% compared to Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) at 11.51%. This indicates that ALAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DECK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALAR | DECK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.72% | 11.51% | +24.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.15% | 31.06% | +24.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 86.79% | 45.42% | +41.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.97% | 43.98% | +52.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 104.86% | 42.47% | +62.39% |
Dividends
ALAR vs. DECK - Dividend Comparison
Neither ALAR nor DECK has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ALAR vs. DECK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alarum Technologies Ltd. and Deckers Outdoor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ALAR vs. DECK - Profitability Comparison
ALAR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alarum Technologies Ltd. reported a gross profit of 7.23M and revenue of 11.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.7%.
DECK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a gross profit of 644.64M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.
ALAR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alarum Technologies Ltd. reported an operating income of 809.00K and revenue of 11.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.9%.
DECK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported an operating income of 156.73M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
ALAR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alarum Technologies Ltd. reported a net income of 593.00K and revenue of 11.71M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.
DECK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a net income of 135.57M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALAR and DECK have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALAR has higher volatility (35.72%) compared to DECK (11.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALAR dropped -99.95% vs DECK's -94.36%.
ALAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALAR and DECK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer