PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AKO-A vs. KRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AKO-A vs. KRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Embotelladora Andina S.A (AKO-A) and Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AKO-A achieves a -10.20% return, which is significantly lower than KRT's 33.08% return.


AKO-A

1D
-11.01%
1M
-7.42%
YTD
-10.20%
6M
-8.49%
1Y
4.96%
3Y*
25.94%
5Y*
21.94%
10Y*
8.38%

KRT

1D
2.04%
1M
5.13%
YTD
33.08%
6M
38.41%
1Y
0.04%
3Y*
29.10%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AKO-A vs. KRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AKO-A
Embotelladora Andina S.A
-10.20%69.94%22.39%32.28%25.25%-22.56%
KRT
Karat Packaging Inc.
33.08%-20.12%28.81%86.11%-27.07%8.89%

Correlation

The correlation between AKO-A and KRT is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2021

0.00

The correlation between AKO-A and KRT shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.00 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AKO-A:

$3.06B

KRT:

$582.73M

EPS

AKO-A:

$1.95K

KRT:

$1.58

PE Ratio

AKO-A:

0.01

KRT:

18.39

PEG Ratio

AKO-A:

0.00

KRT:

1.89

PS Ratio

AKO-A:

0.00

KRT:

1.22

PB Ratio

AKO-A:

0.00

KRT:

3.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

AKO-A:

$3.42T

KRT:

$481.07M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AKO-A:

$1.34T

KRT:

$172.90M

EBITDA (TTM)

AKO-A:

$620.88B

KRT:

$56.33M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AKO-A vs. KRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AKO-A
AKO-A Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
AKO-A Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AKO-A Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AKO-A Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AKO-A Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
AKO-A Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

KRT
KRT Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
KRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRT Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
KRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRT Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AKO-A vs. KRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Embotelladora Andina S.A (AKO-A) and Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AKO-AKRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.04

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

0.00

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.55

0.00

+0.55

AKO-A vs. KRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AKO-A Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is higher than the KRT Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AKO-A and KRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AKO-AKRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

0.00

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.29

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.32

-0.13

Drawdowns

AKO-A vs. KRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AKO-A drawdown since its inception was -79.18%, which is greater than KRT's maximum drawdown of -48.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKO-A and KRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AKO-AKRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.18%

-48.46%

-30.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.40%

-31.57%

+9.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.41%

-34.03%

+8.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

-48.46%

+23.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.40%

-3.86%

-18.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.92%

-18.56%

-12.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.07%

17.40%

-8.33%

Volatility

AKO-A vs. KRT - Volatility Comparison

Embotelladora Andina S.A (AKO-A) has a higher volatility of 16.27% compared to Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) at 13.45%. This indicates that AKO-A's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AKO-AKRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.27%

13.45%

+2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.68%

28.23%

+13.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.00%

39.76%

+12.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.35%

45.40%

-3.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.97%

45.50%

-3.53%

Dividends

AKO-A vs. KRT - Dividend Comparison

AKO-A's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, less than KRT's 6.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AKO-A
Embotelladora Andina S.A
5.09%5.24%6.95%9.27%17.81%8.12%5.74%4.72%4.16%2.63%2.34%2.50%
KRT
Karat Packaging Inc.
6.20%7.98%5.12%6.24%2.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AKO-A vs. KRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Embotelladora Andina S.A and Karat Packaging Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B1.00T20222023202420252026
958.49B
116.95M
(AKO-A) Total Revenue
(KRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AKO-A vs. KRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Embotelladora Andina S.A and Karat Packaging Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

28.0%30.0%32.0%34.0%36.0%38.0%40.0%42.0%20222023202420252026
41.0%
35.5%
Portfolio components
AKO-A - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported a gross profit of 393.07B and revenue of 958.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.0%.

KRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Karat Packaging Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.53M and revenue of 116.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.

AKO-A - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported an operating income of 147.46B and revenue of 958.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.

KRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Karat Packaging Inc. reported an operating income of 8.46M and revenue of 116.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.2%.

AKO-A - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported a net income of 102.93B and revenue of 958.49B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.

KRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Karat Packaging Inc. reported a net income of 6.74M and revenue of 116.95M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AKO-A and KRT have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AKO-A has higher volatility (16.27%) compared to KRT (13.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AKO-A dropped -79.18% vs KRT's -48.46%.

AKO-A currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AKO-A and KRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer