PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AKAM vs. DOCN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AKAM vs. DOCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) and DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. (DOCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AKAM achieves a 62.60% return, which is significantly lower than DOCN's 251.87% return.


AKAM

1D
-4.99%
1M
-3.95%
YTD
62.60%
6M
66.28%
1Y
84.17%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*
10.40%

DOCN

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.28%
YTD
251.87%
6M
242.13%
1Y
491.41%
3Y*
56.88%
5Y*
33.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AKAM vs. DOCN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
62.60%-8.78%-19.18%40.39%-27.97%18.96%
DOCN
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.
251.87%41.24%-7.14%44.05%-68.29%89.01%

Correlation

The correlation between AKAM and DOCN is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2021

0.44

The correlation between AKAM and DOCN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AKAM:

$21.28B

DOCN:

$18.95B

EPS

AKAM:

$2.95

DOCN:

$2.42

PE Ratio

AKAM:

48.03

DOCN:

70.07

PS Ratio

AKAM:

4.90

DOCN:

18.78

PB Ratio

AKAM:

4.34

DOCN:

21.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

AKAM:

$4.27B

DOCN:

$948.63M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AKAM:

$2.44B

DOCN:

$554.86M

EBITDA (TTM)

AKAM:

$1.14B

DOCN:

$373.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AKAM vs. DOCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AKAM
AKAM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AKAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AKAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AKAM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AKAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AKAM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

DOCN
DOCN Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
DOCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOCN Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DOCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOCN Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AKAM vs. DOCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) and DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. (DOCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AKAMDOCNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.65

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

20.56

-17.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.38

61.65

-50.27

AKAM vs. DOCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AKAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the DOCN Sharpe Ratio of 6.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AKAM and DOCN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AKAMDOCNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

6.08

-4.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.47

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.43

-0.43

Drawdowns

AKAM vs. DOCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AKAM drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than DOCN's maximum drawdown of -84.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKAM and DOCN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AKAMDOCNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.80%

-84.78%

-15.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.44%

-24.11%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.84%

-60.28%

+13.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.84%

-84.78%

+37.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.69%

-6.19%

-50.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.62%

-59.09%

-23.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.42%

8.02%

-0.60%

Volatility

AKAM vs. DOCN - Volatility Comparison

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) has a higher volatility of 28.96% compared to DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. (DOCN) at 20.16%. This indicates that AKAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AKAMDOCNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.96%

20.16%

+8.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.61%

61.12%

-13.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.98%

81.71%

-27.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.51%

71.33%

-34.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.45%

70.69%

-36.24%

Dividends

AKAM vs. DOCN - Dividend Comparison

Neither AKAM nor DOCN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AKAM vs. DOCN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Akamai Technologies, Inc. and DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
1.07B
257.91M
(AKAM) Total Revenue
(DOCN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AKAM vs. DOCN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Akamai Technologies, Inc. and DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

54.0%56.0%58.0%60.0%62.0%64.0%20222023202420252026
56.1%
56.1%
Portfolio components
AKAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 602.31M and revenue of 1.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.1%.

DOCN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 144.71M and revenue of 257.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.1%.

AKAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 114.49M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

DOCN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 36.57M and revenue of 257.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.

AKAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 106.32M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.

DOCN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 33.22M and revenue of 257.91M, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AKAM and DOCN have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AKAM has higher volatility (28.96%) compared to DOCN (20.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AKAM dropped -99.80% vs DOCN's -84.78%.

DOCN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.08 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AKAM and DOCN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer