PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AKAM vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AKAM vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AKAM achieves a 62.60% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 5.77% return.


AKAM

1D
-4.99%
1M
-3.95%
YTD
62.60%
6M
66.28%
1Y
84.17%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*
10.40%

BOTZ

1D
0.90%
1M
-7.55%
YTD
5.77%
6M
4.32%
1Y
22.87%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AKAM vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
62.60%-8.78%-19.18%40.39%-27.97%11.48%21.54%41.42%-6.09%-2.46%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
5.77%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%51.92%31.80%-28.34%58.01%

Correlation

The correlation between AKAM and BOTZ is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2016

0.47

The correlation between AKAM and BOTZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AKAM vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AKAM
AKAM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AKAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AKAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AKAM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AKAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AKAM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AKAM vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AKAMBOTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.17

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

1.19

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.38

4.04

+7.35

AKAM vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AKAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AKAM and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AKAMBOTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

0.93

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.09

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.42

-0.42

Drawdowns

AKAM vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AKAM drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKAM and BOTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AKAMBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.80%

-55.54%

-44.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.44%

-19.34%

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.84%

-29.02%

-17.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.84%

-55.54%

+8.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.69%

-7.95%

-48.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.62%

-18.31%

-64.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.42%

5.68%

+1.74%

Volatility

AKAM vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) has a higher volatility of 28.96% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 9.09%. This indicates that AKAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AKAMBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.96%

9.09%

+19.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.61%

18.83%

+28.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.98%

24.62%

+29.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.51%

26.83%

+9.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.45%

25.77%

+8.68%

Dividends

AKAM vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

AKAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.62%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


AKAM and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AKAM has higher volatility (28.96%) compared to BOTZ (9.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AKAM dropped -99.80% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

AKAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AKAM and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer