PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AKAM vs. ABBNY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AKAM vs. ABBNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) and ABB Ltd (ABBNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AKAM achieves a 62.60% return, which is significantly higher than ABBNY's 41.80% return. Over the past 10 years, AKAM has underperformed ABBNY with an annualized return of 10.40%, while ABBNY has yielded a comparatively higher 21.38% annualized return.


AKAM

1D
-4.99%
1M
-3.95%
YTD
62.60%
6M
66.28%
1Y
84.17%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*
10.40%

ABBNY

1D
1.83%
1M
-2.95%
YTD
41.80%
6M
43.11%
1Y
82.41%
3Y*
41.86%
5Y*
27.12%
10Y*
21.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AKAM vs. ABBNY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
62.60%-8.78%-19.18%40.39%-27.97%11.48%21.54%41.42%-6.09%-2.46%
ABBNY
ABB Ltd
41.80%40.49%23.75%49.62%-18.13%40.40%21.21%31.87%-26.52%31.68%

Correlation

The correlation between AKAM and ABBNY is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2001

0.35

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AKAM:

$21.28B

ABBNY:

$188.22B

EPS

AKAM:

$2.95

ABBNY:

$2.71

PE Ratio

AKAM:

48.03

ABBNY:

38.10

PS Ratio

AKAM:

4.90

ABBNY:

5.28

PB Ratio

AKAM:

4.34

ABBNY:

12.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

AKAM:

$4.27B

ABBNY:

$35.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AKAM:

$2.44B

ABBNY:

$14.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

AKAM:

$1.14B

ABBNY:

$7.34B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AKAM vs. ABBNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AKAM
AKAM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AKAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AKAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AKAM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AKAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AKAM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

ABBNY
ABBNY Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ABBNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABBNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABBNY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ABBNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABBNY Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AKAM vs. ABBNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) and ABB Ltd (ABBNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AKAMABBNYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.49

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

5.27

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.38

20.73

-9.35

AKAM vs. ABBNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AKAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the ABBNY Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AKAM and ABBNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AKAMABBNYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

2.79

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

1.05

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.84

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.29

-0.29

Drawdowns

AKAM vs. ABBNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AKAM drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than ABBNY's maximum drawdown of -93.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKAM and ABBNY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AKAMABBNYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.80%

-93.98%

-5.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.44%

-15.71%

-9.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.84%

-20.26%

-26.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.84%

-36.07%

-10.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

-43.98%

-2.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.69%

-5.13%

-51.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.62%

-25.54%

-57.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.42%

3.99%

+3.43%

Volatility

AKAM vs. ABBNY - Volatility Comparison

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) has a higher volatility of 28.96% compared to ABB Ltd (ABBNY) at 10.45%. This indicates that AKAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABBNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AKAMABBNYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.96%

10.45%

+18.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.61%

24.58%

+23.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.98%

29.78%

+24.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.51%

26.06%

+10.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.45%

25.43%

+9.02%

Dividends

AKAM vs. ABBNY - Dividend Comparison

AKAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABBNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABBNY
ABB Ltd
1.18%1.39%1.79%2.07%2.88%2.29%2.77%3.31%4.35%2.84%3.47%4.21%
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AKAM vs. ABBNY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Akamai Technologies, Inc. and ABB Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
1.07B
8.73B
(AKAM) Total Revenue
(ABBNY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AKAM vs. ABBNY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Akamai Technologies, Inc. and ABB Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%20222023202420252026
56.1%
39.4%
Portfolio components
AKAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 602.31M and revenue of 1.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.1%.

ABBNY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ABB Ltd reported a gross profit of 3.44B and revenue of 8.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.

AKAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 114.49M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

ABBNY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ABB Ltd reported an operating income of 1.43B and revenue of 8.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.

AKAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 106.32M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.

ABBNY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ABB Ltd reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 8.73B, resulting in a net margin of 15.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AKAM and ABBNY have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AKAM has higher volatility (28.96%) compared to ABBNY (10.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AKAM dropped -99.80% vs ABBNY's -93.98%.

ABBNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AKAM and ABBNY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer