AJG vs. ED
AJG (Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.) and ED (Consolidated Edison, Inc.) are both stocks. AJG operates in Insurance Brokers (Financial Services), while ED operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, AJG returned 17.92%/yr vs 6.82%/yr for ED. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AJG vs. ED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AJG achieves a -17.35% return, which is significantly lower than ED's 6.73% return. Over the past 10 years, AJG has outperformed ED with an annualized return of 17.92%, while ED has yielded a comparatively lower 6.82% annualized return.
AJG
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- 7.22%
- YTD
- -17.35%
- 6M
- -10.08%
- 1Y
- -34.63%
- 3Y*
- 1.87%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- 17.92%
ED
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 11.06%
- 1Y
- 6.07%
- 3Y*
- 7.34%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- 6.82%
AJG vs. ED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | -17.35% | -8.03% | 27.34% | 20.51% | 12.44% | 39.02% | 32.12% | 31.79% | 19.19% | 25.04% |
ED Consolidated Edison, Inc. | 6.73% | 15.15% | 1.55% | -1.12% | 15.65% | 22.96% | -16.99% | 22.54% | -6.62% | 19.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between AJG and ED is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 1984 | 0.20 |
The correlation between AJG and ED shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AJG:
$5.74
ED:
$5.94
AJG:
37.04
ED:
17.55
AJG:
3.84
ED:
1.25
AJG:
3.97
ED:
2.20
AJG:
$13.94B
ED:
$17.22B
AJG:
$7.63B
ED:
$11.62B
AJG:
$3.66B
ED:
$8.47B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AJG vs. ED — Risk / Return Rank
AJG
ED
AJG vs. ED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) and Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AJG | ED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.07 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 0.63 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | 1.35 | -2.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AJG | ED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.25 | 0.37 | -1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.54 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.33 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.37 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
AJG vs. ED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AJG drawdown since its inception was -57.49%, smaller than the maximum ED drawdown of -78.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AJG and ED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AJG | ED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.49% | -78.90% | +21.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.64% | -9.63% | -31.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.40% | -17.36% | -27.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.40% | -22.03% | -22.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.40% | -30.91% | -13.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.26% | -8.90% | -29.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.83% | -13.24% | +0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.06% | 4.52% | +19.54% |
Volatility
AJG vs. ED - Volatility Comparison
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) has a higher volatility of 8.97% compared to Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) at 5.44%. This indicates that AJG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AJG | ED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.97% | 5.44% | +3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.42% | 12.12% | +10.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.95% | 16.55% | +11.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.96% | 18.77% | +4.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 21.01% | +2.07% |
Dividends
AJG vs. ED - Dividend Comparison
AJG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than ED's 3.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | 1.27% | 1.00% | 0.85% | 0.98% | 1.08% | 1.13% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.23% | 2.47% | 2.93% | 3.62% |
ED Consolidated Edison, Inc. | 3.33% | 3.42% | 3.72% | 3.56% | 3.32% | 3.63% | 4.23% | 3.27% | 3.74% | 3.25% | 3.64% | 4.05% |
Financials
AJG vs. ED - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. and Consolidated Edison, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AJG vs. ED - Profitability Comparison
AJG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 3.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.1%.
ED - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.15B and revenue of 5.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.5%.
AJG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported an operating income of 341.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
ED - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.18B and revenue of 5.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
AJG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a net income of 151.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.
ED - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported a net income of 924.00M and revenue of 5.10B, resulting in a net margin of 18.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AJG and ED have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AJG has higher volatility (8.97%) compared to ED (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AJG dropped -57.49% vs ED's -78.90%.
ED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AJG and ED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer