PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIRR vs. XQQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIRR vs. XQQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AIRR is traded in USD, while XQQ.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XQQ.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIRR achieves a 30.41% return, which is significantly higher than XQQ.TO's 13.12% return. Over the past 10 years, AIRR has outperformed XQQ.TO with an annualized return of 21.61%, while XQQ.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 18.92% annualized return.


AIRR

1D
0.13%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
30.41%
6M
29.32%
1Y
61.66%
3Y*
35.42%
5Y*
24.95%
10Y*
21.61%

XQQ.TO

1D
1.15%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
13.12%
6M
10.11%
1Y
27.06%
3Y*
22.58%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
18.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIRR vs. XQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
30.41%27.92%33.45%31.43%-2.08%33.01%17.17%33.97%-20.57%16.28%
XQQ.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
13.12%21.31%14.96%56.99%-37.11%22.83%49.67%44.89%-8.97%43.10%

Correlation

The correlation between AIRR and XQQ.TO is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2014

0.51

The correlation between AIRR and XQQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIRR vs. XQQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIRR
XQQ.TO

Industrials

84.6%
3.1%

Financial Services

9.6%
0.2%

Energy

3.8%
0.6%

Technology

0.5%
53.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Industrials

AIRR
84.6%
XQQ.TO
3.1%

Financial Services

AIRR
9.6%
XQQ.TO
0.2%

Energy

AIRR
3.8%
XQQ.TO
0.6%

Technology

AIRR
0.5%
XQQ.TO
53.7%

Basic Materials

AIRR

-

XQQ.TO
1.1%

Communication Services

AIRR

-

XQQ.TO
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

AIRR

-

XQQ.TO
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

AIRR

-

XQQ.TO
7.7%

Healthcare

AIRR

-

XQQ.TO
4.2%

Real Estate

AIRR

-

XQQ.TO
0.1%

Utilities

AIRR

-

XQQ.TO
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIRR vs. XQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIRR
AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

XQQ.TO
XQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIRR vs. XQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIRRXQQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.28

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.74

1.88

+2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.47

7.01

+10.46

AIRR vs. XQQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIRR Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the XQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIRR and XQQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIRRXQQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

1.54

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.48

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.81

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.67

0.00

Drawdowns

AIRR vs. XQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIRR drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, roughly equal to the maximum XQQ.TO drawdown of -43.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIRR and XQQ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIRRXQQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.37%

-43.53%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.09%

-14.43%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.95%

-22.99%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.95%

-43.53%

+15.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.37%

-43.53%

+1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-4.84%

+1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-7.80%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

3.87%

-0.33%

Volatility

AIRR vs. XQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) at 6.70%. This indicates that AIRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XQQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIRRXQQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.07%

6.70%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.10%

13.80%

+6.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.55%

17.63%

+7.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.33%

23.44%

+1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.30%

23.38%

+2.92%

AIRR vs. XQQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIRR has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than XQQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIRR vs. XQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than XQQ.TO's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
0.14%0.19%0.18%0.23%0.12%0.05%0.10%0.20%0.43%0.30%0.08%0.47%
XQQ.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
0.22%0.25%0.67%0.93%1.27%0.52%0.80%1.44%1.61%1.64%2.35%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIRR and XQQ.TO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XQQ.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XQQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.

AIRR is categorized as Building & Construction, while XQQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index, while XQQ.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIRR and 0.39% for XQQ.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIRR and XQQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer