PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AII.TO vs. NEO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AII.TO vs. NEO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) and Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AII.TO achieves a 90.14% return, which is significantly lower than NEO.TO's 106.26% return.


AII.TO

1D
1.10%
1M
-14.62%
YTD
90.14%
6M
109.97%
1Y
391.96%
3Y*
191.14%
5Y*
66.38%
10Y*
48.17%

NEO.TO

1D
3.43%
1M
9.90%
YTD
106.26%
6M
93.76%
1Y
195.65%
3Y*
63.99%
5Y*
16.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AII.TO vs. NEO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AII.TO
Almonty Industries Inc.
90.14%784.25%68.52%-20.59%-23.60%39.06%52.38%-35.38%18.18%7.84%
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials Inc.
106.26%101.35%10.42%-16.66%-51.09%50.37%16.30%-17.14%-12.01%2.46%

Correlation

The correlation between AII.TO and NEO.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2017

0.11

Over the past year, AII.TO and NEO.TO have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AII.TO:

CA$6.39B

NEO.TO:

CA$1.33B

EPS

AII.TO:

-CA$0.57

NEO.TO:

-CA$0.24

PS Ratio

AII.TO:

106.45

NEO.TO:

2.66

PB Ratio

AII.TO:

17.93

NEO.TO:

3.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

AII.TO:

CA$50.01M

NEO.TO:

CA$511.45M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AII.TO:

CA$14.63M

NEO.TO:

CA$147.42M

EBITDA (TTM)

AII.TO:

-CA$120.84M

NEO.TO:

CA$61.97M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AII.TO vs. NEO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AII.TO
AII.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AII.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AII.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AII.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AII.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AII.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

NEO.TO
NEO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
NEO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AII.TO vs. NEO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) and Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AII.TONEO.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.42

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.21

6.00

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.41

12.49

+2.92

AII.TO vs. NEO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AII.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.47, which is comparable to the NEO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AII.TO and NEO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AII.TONEO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47

3.09

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.30

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.21

+0.09

Drawdowns

AII.TO vs. NEO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AII.TO drawdown since its inception was -80.14%, which is greater than NEO.TO's maximum drawdown of -72.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AII.TO and NEO.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AII.TONEO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.14%

-72.44%

-7.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.79%

-32.83%

-21.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.79%

-37.56%

-17.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.17%

-72.44%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.44%

-10.53%

-17.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.52%

-34.93%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.59%

15.74%

+9.85%

Volatility

AII.TO vs. NEO.TO - Volatility Comparison

Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) has a higher volatility of 32.86% compared to Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) at 24.69%. This indicates that AII.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AII.TONEO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.86%

24.69%

+8.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.55%

44.28%

+24.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.99%

63.94%

+50.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.41%

53.45%

+20.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.21%

52.37%

+22.84%

Dividends

AII.TO vs. NEO.TO - Dividend Comparison

AII.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AII.TO
Almonty Industries Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials Inc.
1.25%2.57%5.01%5.24%4.17%1.97%2.90%3.20%2.47%

Financials

AII.TO vs. NEO.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Almonty Industries Inc. and Neo Performance Materials Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
25.40M
152.42M
(AII.TO) Total Revenue
(NEO.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

AII.TO vs. NEO.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Almonty Industries Inc. and Neo Performance Materials Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
51.2%
31.4%
Portfolio components
AII.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Almonty Industries Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.01M and revenue of 25.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.2%.

NEO.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported a gross profit of 47.82M and revenue of 152.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.4%.

AII.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Almonty Industries Inc. reported an operating income of 2.24M and revenue of 25.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

NEO.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported an operating income of 26.12M and revenue of 152.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.

AII.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Almonty Industries Inc. reported a net income of -5.26M and revenue of 25.40M, resulting in a net margin of -20.7%.

NEO.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported a net income of -1.62M and revenue of 152.42M, resulting in a net margin of -1.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AII.TO and NEO.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AII.TO and NEO.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer