PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AII.TO vs. LUN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AII.TO vs. LUN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) and Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AII.TO achieves a 90.14% return, which is significantly higher than LUN.TO's 29.22% return. Over the past 10 years, AII.TO has outperformed LUN.TO with an annualized return of 48.17%, while LUN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 27.33% annualized return.


AII.TO

1D
1.10%
1M
-14.62%
YTD
90.14%
6M
109.97%
1Y
391.96%
3Y*
191.14%
5Y*
66.38%
10Y*
48.17%

LUN.TO

1D
2.26%
1M
2.49%
YTD
29.22%
6M
50.43%
1Y
164.52%
3Y*
59.24%
5Y*
28.33%
10Y*
27.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AII.TO vs. LUN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AII.TO
Almonty Industries Inc.
90.14%784.25%68.52%-20.59%-23.60%39.06%52.38%-35.38%18.18%103.70%
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corporation
29.22%141.86%17.72%35.67%-11.74%-9.34%49.12%40.12%-31.40%32.67%

Correlation

The correlation between AII.TO and LUN.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2010

0.07

Over the past year, AII.TO and LUN.TO have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AII.TO:

CA$6.39B

LUN.TO:

CA$32.76B

EPS

AII.TO:

-CA$0.57

LUN.TO:

CA$1.69

PS Ratio

AII.TO:

106.45

LUN.TO:

8.10

PB Ratio

AII.TO:

17.93

LUN.TO:

4.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

AII.TO:

CA$50.01M

LUN.TO:

CA$4.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AII.TO:

CA$14.63M

LUN.TO:

CA$1.55B

EBITDA (TTM)

AII.TO:

-CA$120.84M

LUN.TO:

CA$1.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AII.TO vs. LUN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AII.TO
AII.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AII.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AII.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AII.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AII.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AII.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

LUN.TO
LUN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
LUN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LUN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AII.TO vs. LUN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) and Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AII.TOLUN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.45

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.21

4.92

+2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.41

16.40

-0.99

AII.TO vs. LUN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AII.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.47, which is comparable to the LUN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AII.TO and LUN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AII.TOLUN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47

3.15

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.62

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.60

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.15

+0.15

Drawdowns

AII.TO vs. LUN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AII.TO drawdown since its inception was -80.14%, smaller than the maximum LUN.TO drawdown of -95.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AII.TO and LUN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AII.TOLUN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.14%

-95.33%

+15.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.79%

-33.67%

-21.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.79%

-47.11%

-7.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.17%

-53.91%

-10.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.52%

-57.61%

-10.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.44%

-14.17%

-14.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.52%

-48.72%

+15.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.59%

10.08%

+15.51%

Volatility

AII.TO vs. LUN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) has a higher volatility of 32.86% compared to Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) at 20.66%. This indicates that AII.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LUN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AII.TOLUN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.86%

20.66%

+12.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.55%

44.38%

+24.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.99%

52.71%

+61.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.41%

46.18%

+28.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.21%

45.95%

+29.26%

Dividends

AII.TO vs. LUN.TO - Dividend Comparison

AII.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LUN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AII.TO
Almonty Industries Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corporation
0.29%0.68%3.64%3.32%5.66%3.95%1.42%1.55%2.13%1.44%

Financials

AII.TO vs. LUN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Almonty Industries Inc. and Lundin Mining Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
25.40M
1.16B
(AII.TO) Total Revenue
(LUN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

AII.TO vs. LUN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Almonty Industries Inc. and Lundin Mining Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
51.2%
46.4%
Portfolio components
AII.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Almonty Industries Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.01M and revenue of 25.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.2%.

LUN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a gross profit of 537.50M and revenue of 1.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.

AII.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Almonty Industries Inc. reported an operating income of 2.24M and revenue of 25.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

LUN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported an operating income of 503.80M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 43.5%.

AII.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Almonty Industries Inc. reported a net income of -5.26M and revenue of 25.40M, resulting in a net margin of -20.7%.

LUN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a net income of 281.40M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AII.TO and LUN.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AII.TO and LUN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer