PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGZD vs. ^RTSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AGZD vs. ^RTSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD) and RTS Index (^RTSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGZD achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly higher than ^RTSI's 0.37% return. Over the past 10 years, AGZD has outperformed ^RTSI with an annualized return of 3.19%, while ^RTSI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.17% annualized return.


AGZD

1D
-0.38%
1M
0.49%
YTD
2.47%
6M
2.73%
1Y
5.70%
3Y*
6.10%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
3.19%

^RTSI

1D
-1.70%
1M
1.53%
YTD
0.37%
6M
1.40%
1Y
0.87%
3Y*
2.07%
5Y*
-7.45%
10Y*
2.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGZD vs. ^RTSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund
2.47%4.35%6.64%7.15%1.17%0.69%0.31%4.65%0.18%2.62%
^RTSI
RTS Index
0.37%24.73%-17.56%11.63%-39.18%15.01%-10.42%44.93%-7.42%0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between AGZD and ^RTSI is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2013

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGZD vs. ^RTSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGZD
AGZD Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AGZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGZD Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AGZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGZD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

^RTSI
^RTSI Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
^RTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^RTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
^RTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
^RTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
^RTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGZD vs. ^RTSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD) and RTS Index (^RTSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGZD^RTSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.01

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.60

-0.07

+6.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.71

-0.15

+20.86

AGZD vs. ^RTSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGZD Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the ^RTSI Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGZD and ^RTSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGZD^RTSIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

-0.06

+2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

-0.21

+1.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.07

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.21

+0.43

Drawdowns

AGZD vs. ^RTSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGZD drawdown since its inception was -8.46%, smaller than the maximum ^RTSI drawdown of -93.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGZD and ^RTSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGZD^RTSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

-93.26%

+84.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.87%

-17.79%

+16.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.71%

-40.03%

+38.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.23%

-62.14%

+59.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.46%

-62.14%

+53.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-55.05%

+54.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-43.30%

+42.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

8.17%

-7.89%

Volatility

AGZD vs. ^RTSI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD) is 1.18%, while RTS Index (^RTSI) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that AGZD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^RTSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGZD^RTSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

5.98%

-4.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.05%

12.81%

-10.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95%

21.07%

-18.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.60%

36.06%

-32.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.72%

31.01%

-27.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGZD and ^RTSI have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^RTSI has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to AGZD (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGZD dropped -8.46% vs ^RTSI's -93.26%.

AGZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGZD and ^RTSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer