PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGNC vs. XOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AGNC vs. XOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGNC achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 27.80% return. Over the past 10 years, AGNC has underperformed XOM with an annualized return of 6.25%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.04% annualized return.


AGNC

1D
-0.59%
1M
-5.84%
YTD
-0.32%
6M
3.01%
1Y
27.55%
3Y*
17.15%
5Y*
1.42%
10Y*
6.25%

XOM

1D
1.22%
1M
5.68%
YTD
27.80%
6M
32.61%
1Y
50.17%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
23.83%
10Y*
10.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGNC vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
-0.32%34.92%8.90%10.14%-21.65%5.20%-1.78%13.31%-2.46%23.73%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
27.80%15.98%11.26%-6.26%87.41%57.58%-36.21%7.23%-15.09%-3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AGNC and XOM is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2008

0.26

The correlation between AGNC and XOM shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AGNC:

$11.35B

XOM:

$634.77B

EPS

AGNC:

$1.33

XOM:

$5.93

PE Ratio

AGNC:

7.60

XOM:

25.60

PEG Ratio

AGNC:

0.02

XOM:

1.19

PS Ratio

AGNC:

4.66

XOM:

1.99

PB Ratio

AGNC:

1.11

XOM:

2.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

AGNC:

$2.33B

XOM:

$326.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AGNC:

$2.30B

XOM:

$83.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

AGNC:

$3.72B

XOM:

$60.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGNC vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGNC
AGNC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
AGNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGNC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
AGNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGNC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

XOM
XOM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGNC vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGNCXOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

3.21

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.39

8.97

-4.58

AGNC vs. XOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGNC Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the XOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGNC and XOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGNCXOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.07

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.90

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.36

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.48

-0.05

Drawdowns

AGNC vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGNC drawdown since its inception was -54.56%, smaller than the maximum XOM drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGNC and XOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGNCXOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.56%

-62.40%

+7.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.71%

-15.69%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.04%

-18.92%

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.36%

-20.51%

-33.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.56%

-61.34%

+6.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.19%

-10.90%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.56%

-10.20%

-3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.30%

5.61%

+0.69%

Volatility

AGNC vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) is 4.92%, while Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that AGNC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGNCXOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

9.20%

-4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.96%

20.29%

-4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.38%

24.44%

-5.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.82%

26.73%

-0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.39%

28.19%

-2.80%

Dividends

AGNC vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison

AGNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.24%, more than XOM's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
14.24%13.43%15.64%14.68%13.91%9.57%10.00%11.31%12.31%10.70%12.69%14.30%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
2.69%3.32%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%

Financials

AGNC vs. XOM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AGNC Investment Corp. and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B202220232024202520260
83.16B
(AGNC) Total Revenue
(XOM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AGNC and XOM have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOM has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to AGNC (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGNC dropped -54.56% vs XOM's -62.40%.

XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGNC and XOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer