PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGMI vs. BITO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGMI vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGMI achieves a -2.59% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -28.69% return.


AGMI

1D
0.66%
1M
-16.22%
YTD
-2.59%
6M
11.21%
1Y
87.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITO

1D
4.87%
1M
-21.24%
YTD
-28.69%
6M
-31.34%
1Y
-41.80%
3Y*
25.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGMI vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AGMI
Themes Silver Miners ETF
-2.59%176.11%-0.74%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-28.69%-11.19%43.44%

Correlation

The correlation between AGMI and BITO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2024

0.25

AGMI vs. BITO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AGMI
BITO

Basic Materials

100.0%

-

Technology

0.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

64.9%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

AGMI
100.0%
BITO

-

Technology

AGMI
0.0%
BITO

-

Communication Services

AGMI

-

BITO

-

Consumer Cyclical

AGMI

-

BITO

-

Consumer Defensive

AGMI

-

BITO

-

Energy

AGMI

-

BITO

-

Financial Services

AGMI

-

BITO
64.9%

Healthcare

AGMI

-

BITO

-

Industrials

AGMI

-

BITO

-

Real Estate

AGMI

-

BITO

-

Utilities

AGMI

-

BITO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGMI vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGMI
AGMI Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
AGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
AGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

BITO
BITO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGMI vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGMIBITODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.85

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

-0.79

+3.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.90

-1.41

+8.31

AGMI vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGMI and BITO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGMIBITODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

-0.95

+2.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

-0.10

+1.46

Drawdowns

AGMI vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGMI drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, smaller than the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGMI and BITO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGMIBITODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.26%

-77.86%

+44.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.26%

-53.10%

+19.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.71%

-50.82%

+21.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-36.77%

+27.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.65%

29.63%

-16.98%

Volatility

AGMI vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) has a higher volatility of 18.87% compared to ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) at 11.55%. This indicates that AGMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGMIBITODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.87%

11.55%

+7.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.42%

34.35%

+8.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.12%

44.07%

+6.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.52%

55.15%

-10.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.52%

55.15%

-10.63%

AGMI vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGMI vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

AGMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, less than BITO's 69.83% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AGMI
Themes Silver Miners ETF
4.55%4.43%1.81%0.00%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
69.83%78.29%61.59%15.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGMI and BITO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGMI has higher volatility (18.87%) compared to BITO (11.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGMI dropped -33.26% vs BITO's -77.86%.

On 1-year performance, AGMI leads with 87.00% vs -41.80% for BITO. On fees, AGMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BITO has been the lower-risk option at 11.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AGMI has performed better with a 87.00% return vs -41.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITO.

BITO has the higher dividend yield at 69.83%, compared with 4.55% for AGMI.

AGMI is categorized as Silver, while BITO is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Themes and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AGMI and 0.95% for BITO.

AGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGMI and BITO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer