PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGG vs. JNK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGG vs. JNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGG achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than JNK's 1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, AGG has underperformed JNK with an annualized return of 1.52%, while JNK has yielded a comparatively higher 4.94% annualized return.


AGG

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
-0.08%
6M
0.26%
1Y
4.97%
3Y*
3.88%
5Y*
-0.03%
10Y*
1.52%

JNK

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
1.30%
6M
1.95%
1Y
6.98%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*
4.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGG vs. JNK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
-0.08%7.19%1.31%5.65%-13.02%-1.77%7.48%8.46%0.09%3.55%
JNK
SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF
1.30%8.76%7.71%12.42%-12.19%4.00%4.95%14.88%-3.28%6.49%

Correlation

The correlation between AGG and JNK is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2007

0.12

Over the past year, AGG and JNK have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGG vs. JNK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGG
AGG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
AGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

JNK
JNK Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
JNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNK Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
JNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNK Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGG vs. JNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGGJNKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.80

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.44

12.30

-6.87

AGG vs. JNK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGG Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the JNK Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGG and JNK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGGJNKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.83

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.48

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.60

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.42

+0.17

Drawdowns

AGG vs. JNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGG drawdown since its inception was -18.43%, smaller than the maximum JNK drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGG and JNK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGGJNKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.43%

-38.48%

+20.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-2.51%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-5.02%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.82%

-16.67%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.43%

-22.89%

+4.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

-0.46%

-2.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.71%

-3.70%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.57%

+0.35%

Volatility

AGG vs. JNK - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) has a higher volatility of 1.29% compared to SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) at 1.12%. This indicates that AGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGGJNKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

1.12%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.77%

3.00%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.80%

3.84%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.09%

7.55%

-1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.41%

8.31%

-2.90%

AGG vs. JNK - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than JNK's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGG vs. JNK - Dividend Comparison

AGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than JNK's 6.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.00%3.89%3.74%3.13%2.39%1.77%2.14%2.70%2.72%2.32%2.39%2.45%
JNK
SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF
6.64%6.54%6.63%6.38%6.06%4.27%5.11%5.44%5.90%5.60%6.06%6.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGG and JNK have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGG has higher volatility (1.29%) compared to JNK (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGG dropped -18.43% vs JNK's -38.48%.

On 10-year performance, JNK leads with 4.94% vs 1.52% for AGG. On fees, AGG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, JNK has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JNK has performed better with a 4.94% return vs 1.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JNK.

JNK has the higher dividend yield at 6.64%, compared with 4.00% for AGG.

AGG is categorized as Total Bond Market, while JNK is High Yield Bonds. AGG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while JNK tracks Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for AGG and 0.40% for JNK.

JNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGG and JNK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer