AFRM vs. DCO
AFRM (Affirm Holdings, Inc.) and DCO (Ducommun Incorporated) are both stocks. AFRM operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while DCO operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, AFRM returned 1.67%/yr vs 22.05%/yr for DCO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AFRM vs. DCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFRM achieves a -12.05% return, which is significantly lower than DCO's 57.72% return.
AFRM
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- -12.05%
- 6M
- -3.89%
- 1Y
- 11.10%
- 3Y*
- 55.56%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- —
DCO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 9.33%
- YTD
- 57.72%
- 6M
- 66.60%
- 1Y
- 103.39%
- 3Y*
- 48.55%
- 5Y*
- 22.05%
- 10Y*
- 22.92%
AFRM vs. DCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc. | -12.05% | 22.22% | 23.93% | 408.17% | -90.38% | 3.41% |
DCO Ducommun Incorporated | 57.72% | 49.43% | 22.28% | 4.20% | 6.82% | -16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFRM and DCO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2021 | 0.29 |
The correlation between AFRM and DCO shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AFRM:
$22.79B
DCO:
$2.34B
AFRM:
$1.10
DCO:
-$2.27
AFRM:
7.10
DCO:
2.71
AFRM:
6.02
DCO:
3.49
AFRM:
$3.20B
DCO:
$839.64M
AFRM:
$2.00B
DCO:
$226.25M
AFRM:
$908.84M
DCO:
$11.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFRM vs. DCO — Risk / Return Rank
AFRM
DCO
AFRM vs. DCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) and Ducommun Incorporated (DCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFRM | DCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.45 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 6.49 | -6.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.42 | 19.63 | -19.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFRM | DCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | 2.97 | -2.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.66 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.16 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
AFRM vs. DCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFRM drawdown since its inception was -94.71%, roughly equal to the maximum DCO drawdown of -95.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFRM and DCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFRM | DCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.71% | -95.13% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.86% | -16.03% | -37.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.85% | -23.46% | -32.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.71% | -30.81% | -63.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.16% | -1.45% | -59.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.72% | -38.18% | -30.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.80% | 5.29% | +21.51% |
Volatility
AFRM vs. DCO - Volatility Comparison
Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) has a higher volatility of 17.96% compared to Ducommun Incorporated (DCO) at 10.51%. This indicates that AFRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFRM | DCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.96% | 10.51% | +7.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.45% | 26.06% | +17.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.85% | 35.06% | +25.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.31% | 33.47% | +62.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.55% | 43.67% | +51.88% |
Dividends
AFRM vs. DCO - Dividend Comparison
Neither AFRM nor DCO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
AFRM vs. DCO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Affirm Holdings, Inc. and Ducommun Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AFRM vs. DCO - Profitability Comparison
AFRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 268.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
DCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ducommun Incorporated reported a gross profit of 56.23M and revenue of 209.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.
AFRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 88.43M and revenue of 268.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 33.0%.
DCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ducommun Incorporated reported an operating income of 15.72M and revenue of 209.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.
AFRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 102.90M and revenue of 268.03M, resulting in a net margin of 38.4%.
DCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ducommun Incorporated reported a net income of 9.92M and revenue of 209.02M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AFRM and DCO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AFRM has higher volatility (17.96%) compared to DCO (10.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFRM dropped -94.71% vs DCO's -95.13%.
DCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFRM and DCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer