PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFL vs. JPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AFL vs. JPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFL achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly higher than JPM's -2.52% return. Over the past 10 years, AFL has underperformed JPM with an annualized return of 15.48%, while JPM has yielded a comparatively higher 20.32% annualized return.


AFL

1D
-2.54%
1M
2.42%
YTD
5.61%
6M
7.77%
1Y
13.52%
3Y*
21.24%
5Y*
17.94%
10Y*
15.48%

JPM

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.98%
YTD
-2.52%
6M
-0.35%
1Y
19.35%
3Y*
33.18%
5Y*
16.72%
10Y*
20.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFL vs. JPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
5.61%8.94%28.08%17.36%26.41%34.55%-13.60%18.55%6.20%29.02%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
-2.52%37.27%44.29%30.63%-12.64%27.75%-5.53%47.26%-6.62%26.76%

Correlation

The correlation between AFL and JPM is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984

0.42

The correlation between AFL and JPM shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.60 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AFL:

$59.32B

JPM:

$869.15B

EPS

AFL:

$8.76

JPM:

$21.08

PE Ratio

AFL:

13.16

JPM:

14.76

PEG Ratio

AFL:

3.41

JPM:

1.63

PS Ratio

AFL:

3.35

JPM:

3.05

PB Ratio

AFL:

2.64

JPM:

2.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

AFL:

$18.22B

JPM:

$285.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AFL:

$8.70B

JPM:

$173.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

AFL:

$6.67B

JPM:

$81.46B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFL vs. JPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFL
AFL Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

JPM
JPM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
JPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFL vs. JPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFLJPMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.17

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

1.26

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.70

2.98

+0.72

AFL vs. JPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFL Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the JPM Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFL and JPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFLJPMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

0.90

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.69

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.74

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.34

+0.14

Drawdowns

AFL vs. JPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFL drawdown since its inception was -82.71%, which is greater than JPM's maximum drawdown of -76.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFL and JPM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFLJPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.71%

-76.16%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-15.47%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.56%

-24.42%

+10.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.86%

-38.77%

+18.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.89%

-43.63%

-11.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.54%

-6.55%

+4.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.66%

-17.62%

+5.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

6.50%

-2.83%

Volatility

AFL vs. JPM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aflac Incorporated (AFL) is 5.82%, while JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that AFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFLJPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

6.40%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.24%

17.38%

-5.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.08%

21.62%

-4.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.94%

24.45%

-3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.77%

27.40%

-1.63%

Dividends

AFL vs. JPM - Dividend Comparison

AFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than JPM's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
2.07%2.10%1.93%2.04%2.22%2.26%2.52%2.04%2.28%1.98%2.39%2.64%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.90%1.72%1.92%2.38%2.98%2.34%2.83%2.37%2.54%1.91%2.13%2.54%

Financials

AFL vs. JPM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aflac Incorporated and JPMorgan Chase & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
4.32B
73.66B
(AFL) Total Revenue
(JPM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AFL vs. JPM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Aflac Incorporated and JPMorgan Chase & Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
57.5%
64.3%
Portfolio components
AFL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported a gross profit of 2.48B and revenue of 4.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.

JPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a gross profit of 47.33B and revenue of 73.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.3%.

AFL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported an operating income of 1.23B and revenue of 4.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

JPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported an operating income of 20.48B and revenue of 73.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.8%.

AFL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 4.32B, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.

JPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a net income of 16.49B and revenue of 73.66B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AFL and JPM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPM has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to AFL (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFL dropped -82.71% vs JPM's -76.16%.

JPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFL and JPM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer