PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEVA vs. MRVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AEVA vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEVA achieves a 73.87% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 240.32% return.


AEVA

1D
0.35%
1M
70.15%
YTD
73.87%
6M
53.02%
1Y
10.48%
3Y*
49.22%
5Y*
-16.40%
10Y*

MRVL

1D
9.63%
1M
69.78%
YTD
240.32%
6M
214.35%
1Y
323.75%
3Y*
69.41%
5Y*
42.37%
10Y*
41.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEVA vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AEVA
Aeva Technologies, Inc.
73.87%179.58%25.38%-44.29%-82.01%-48.01%51.46%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
240.32%-22.82%83.79%63.68%-57.48%84.62%114.11%

Correlation

The correlation between AEVA and MRVL is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2020

0.36

The correlation between AEVA and MRVL shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AEVA:

$1.45B

MRVL:

$258.03B

EPS

AEVA:

-$2.52

MRVL:

$2.90

PS Ratio

AEVA:

63.51

MRVL:

28.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

AEVA:

$20.97M

MRVL:

$8.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AEVA:

$971.00K

MRVL:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

AEVA:

$21.17M

MRVL:

$4.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEVA vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEVA
AEVA Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
AEVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEVA Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AEVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEVA Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

MRVL
MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEVA vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AEVAMRVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.59

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

12.37

-12.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

28.64

-28.46

AEVA vs. MRVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEVA Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the MRVL Sharpe Ratio of 4.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEVA and MRVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AEVAMRVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

4.70

-4.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.69

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.23

-0.36

Drawdowns

AEVA vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEVA drawdown since its inception was -97.71%, which is greater than MRVL's maximum drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEVA and MRVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEVAMRVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.71%

-91.60%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.68%

-26.36%

-49.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.68%

-60.79%

-14.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.02%

-61.88%

-34.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.91%

-8.72%

-68.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.68%

-46.77%

-23.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.91%

11.37%

+44.54%

Volatility

AEVA vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison

Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) have volatilities of 39.11% and 38.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEVAMRVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.11%

38.50%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

78.74%

54.32%

+24.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

114.82%

69.56%

+45.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.00%

61.51%

+35.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.35%

51.77%

+39.58%

Dividends

AEVA vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison

AEVA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEVA
Aeva Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.08%0.28%0.22%0.40%0.65%0.21%0.50%0.90%1.48%1.12%1.73%2.72%

Financials

AEVA vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aeva Technologies, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
6.26M
2.42B
(AEVA) Total Revenue
(MRVL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AEVA and MRVL have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AEVA has higher volatility (39.11%) compared to MRVL (38.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEVA dropped -97.71% vs MRVL's -91.60%.

MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEVA and MRVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer