PortfoliosLab logo
AES vs. AQN.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AES and AQN.TO is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AES vs. AQN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The AES Corporation (AES) and Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AES:

-0.91

AQN.TO:

0.21

Sortino Ratio

AES:

-1.30

AQN.TO:

0.57

Omega Ratio

AES:

0.84

AQN.TO:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

AES:

-0.55

AQN.TO:

0.11

Martin Ratio

AES:

-1.31

AQN.TO:

0.46

Ulcer Index

AES:

33.09%

AQN.TO:

16.00%

Daily Std Dev

AES:

46.34%

AQN.TO:

34.78%

Max Drawdown

AES:

-98.65%

AQN.TO:

-78.58%

Current Drawdown

AES:

-78.32%

AQN.TO:

-54.27%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AES:

$7.41B

AQN.TO:

CA$6.02B

EPS

AES:

$1.84

AQN.TO:

CA$0.38

PE Ratio

AES:

5.66

AQN.TO:

20.63

PEG Ratio

AES:

1.09

AQN.TO:

1.41

PS Ratio

AES:

0.61

AQN.TO:

2.54

PB Ratio

AES:

2.14

AQN.TO:

0.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

AES:

$12.12B

AQN.TO:

CA$2.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AES:

$2.14B

AQN.TO:

CA$1.85B

EBITDA (TTM)

AES:

$3.01B

AQN.TO:

CA$468.93M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AES achieves a -18.45% return, which is significantly lower than AQN.TO's 25.35% return. Over the past 10 years, AES has underperformed AQN.TO with an annualized return of 0.83%, while AQN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 3.39% annualized return.


AES

YTD

-18.45%

1M

1.60%

6M

-19.63%

1Y

-42.01%

3Y*

-18.88%

5Y*

-2.67%

10Y*

0.83%

AQN.TO

YTD

25.35%

1M

3.54%

6M

26.14%

1Y

7.22%

3Y*

-18.52%

5Y*

-9.91%

10Y*

3.39%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


The AES Corporation

Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AES vs. AQN.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AES
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AES is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AES is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AES is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AES is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AES is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AES is 99
Martin Ratio Rank

AQN.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AQN.TO is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AQN.TO is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AQN.TO is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AQN.TO is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AQN.TO is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AQN.TO is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AES vs. AQN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The AES Corporation (AES) and Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AES Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the AQN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AES and AQN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

AES vs. AQN.TO - Dividend Comparison

AES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, more than AQN.TO's 6.14% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AES
The AES Corporation
6.88%5.38%3.45%2.20%2.49%2.43%2.75%3.60%4.43%3.79%4.18%1.45%
AQN.TO
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.
6.14%8.54%6.94%10.66%5.59%3.96%3.98%4.82%4.27%4.82%4.50%3.83%

Drawdowns

AES vs. AQN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AES drawdown since its inception was -98.65%, which is greater than AQN.TO's maximum drawdown of -78.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AES and AQN.TO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

AES vs. AQN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The AES Corporation (AES) is 14.09%, while Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN.TO) has a volatility of 16.88%. This indicates that AES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AQN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

AES vs. AQN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The AES Corporation and Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
2.93B
692.40M
(AES) Total Revenue
(AQN.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AES values in USD, AQN.TO values in CAD

AES vs. AQN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The AES Corporation and Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
15.1%
70.4%
(AES) Gross Margin
(AQN.TO) Gross Margin
AES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, The AES Corporation reported a gross profit of 441.00M and revenue of 2.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

AQN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. reported a gross profit of 487.40M and revenue of 692.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.4%.

AES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, The AES Corporation reported an operating income of 364.00M and revenue of 2.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.4%.

AQN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. reported an operating income of 182.80M and revenue of 692.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.4%.

AES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, The AES Corporation reported a net income of 46.00M and revenue of 2.93B, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.

AQN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. reported a net income of 96.80M and revenue of 692.40M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.