PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEM vs. BIP-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AEM vs. BIP-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AEM is traded in USD, while BIP-UN.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the BIP-UN.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEM achieves a -3.97% return, which is significantly lower than BIP-UN.TO's 13.82% return. Over the past 10 years, AEM has underperformed BIP-UN.TO with an annualized return of 14.51%, while BIP-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 28.77% annualized return.


AEM

1D
-0.95%
1M
-15.89%
YTD
-3.97%
6M
-1.17%
1Y
38.70%
3Y*
49.86%
5Y*
20.89%
10Y*
14.51%

BIP-UN.TO

1D
-0.39%
1M
6.39%
YTD
13.82%
6M
12.37%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
7.00%
5Y*
14.92%
10Y*
28.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEM vs. BIP-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
-3.97%119.53%46.04%8.98%1.08%-22.81%17.39%54.18%-11.51%10.92%
BIP-UN.TO
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P
13.82%15.30%6.27%7.08%20.25%27.91%17.32%52.53%-17.94%42.93%

Correlation

The correlation between AEM and BIP-UN.TO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2009

0.07

The correlation between AEM and BIP-UN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.20 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AEM:

$81.34B

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$24.85B

EPS

AEM:

$10.60

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$0.91

PE Ratio

AEM:

15.30

BIP-UN.TO:

59.66

PEG Ratio

AEM:

0.24

BIP-UN.TO:

0.31

PS Ratio

AEM:

6.04

BIP-UN.TO:

1.04

PB Ratio

AEM:

3.10

BIP-UN.TO:

5.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

AEM:

$13.51B

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$24.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AEM:

$8.28B

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$6.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

AEM:

$9.72B

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$11.14B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEM vs. BIP-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEM
AEM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

BIP-UN.TO
BIP-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BIP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEM vs. BIP-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AEMBIP-UN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.20

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

1.75

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.96

3.79

-0.84

AEM vs. BIP-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the BIP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEM and BIP-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AEMBIP-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

1.15

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.45

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.74

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.90

-0.74

Drawdowns

AEM vs. BIP-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEM drawdown since its inception was -90.49%, which is greater than BIP-UN.TO's maximum drawdown of -51.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM and BIP-UN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEMBIP-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.49%

-51.41%

-39.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.56%

-12.06%

-23.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.56%

-41.17%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.22%

-47.89%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.86%

-51.41%

-2.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.56%

-1.52%

-34.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.66%

-7.80%

-38.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.12%

5.55%

+7.57%

Volatility

AEM vs. BIP-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a higher volatility of 14.34% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) at 4.78%. This indicates that AEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIP-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEMBIP-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.34%

4.78%

+9.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.53%

14.26%

+21.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.68%

18.41%

+25.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.98%

33.34%

+3.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.31%

38.92%

-1.61%

Dividends

AEM vs. BIP-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than BIP-UN.TO's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.05%0.94%2.05%2.92%3.08%2.63%2.36%0.89%1.09%0.89%0.86%1.22%
BIP-UN.TO
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P
4.51%5.04%4.85%5.00%4.23%3.97%5.61%5.62%6.65%5.64%5.16%10.13%

Financials

AEM vs. BIP-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
4.10B
6.30B
(AEM) Total Revenue
(BIP-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AEM values in USD, BIP-UN.TO values in CAD

AEM vs. BIP-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
66.4%
26.9%
Portfolio components
AEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.

BIP-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a gross profit of 1.70B and revenue of 6.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.

AEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 62.4%.

BIP-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported an operating income of 1.59B and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.

AEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.70B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.

BIP-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AEM and BIP-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEM and BIP-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer