AEM.TO vs. KUYAF
AEM.TO (Agnico Eagle Mines Limited) and KUYAF (Kuya Silver Corp) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — AEM.TO in Gold, KUYAF in Silver. Over the past 5 years, AEM.TO returned 24.22%/yr vs -16.70%/yr for KUYAF. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AEM.TO vs. KUYAF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AEM.TO is traded in CAD, while KUYAF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KUYAF values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEM.TO achieves a -2.49% return, which is significantly higher than KUYAF's -31.23% return.
AEM.TO
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -14.34%
- YTD
- -2.49%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- 41.16%
- 3Y*
- 52.05%
- 5Y*
- 24.22%
- 10Y*
- 15.27%
KUYAF
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -28.42%
- YTD
- -31.23%
- 6M
- 20.12%
- 1Y
- 101.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- -16.70%
- 10Y*
- —
AEM.TO vs. KUYAF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEM.TO Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | -2.49% | 109.63% | 58.54% | 6.65% | 8.01% | -23.56% | 13.64% | 46.58% | 10.84% |
KUYAF Kuya Silver Corp | -31.23% | 322.00% | 2.12% | -36.23% | -56.19% | -68.57% | 166.69% | -71.79% | 4.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEM.TO and KUYAF is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2018 | 0.23 |
Over the past year, AEM.TO and KUYAF have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.23, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
AEM.TO:
CA$113.39B
KUYAF:
$98.29M
AEM.TO:
CA$10.65
KUYAF:
-$0.02
AEM.TO:
8.38
KUYAF:
21.51
AEM.TO:
4.32
KUYAF:
1.96
AEM.TO:
CA$13.56B
KUYAF:
$3.69M
AEM.TO:
CA$8.26B
KUYAF:
-$36.90K
AEM.TO:
CA$9.54B
KUYAF:
-$3.56M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEM.TO vs. KUYAF — Risk / Return Rank
AEM.TO
KUYAF
AEM.TO vs. KUYAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) and Kuya Silver Corp (KUYAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AEM.TO | KUYAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.22 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 2.42 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.18 | 5.55 | -2.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AEM.TO | KUYAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 1.08 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | -0.19 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | -0.17 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
AEM.TO vs. KUYAF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -70.33%, smaller than the maximum KUYAF drawdown of -96.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM.TO and KUYAF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEM.TO | KUYAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.33% | -96.73% | +26.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.29% | -42.23% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.29% | -56.34% | +22.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.35% | -89.17% | +46.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.29% | -88.13% | +53.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.16% | -80.94% | +51.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.96% | 18.41% | -5.45% |
Volatility
AEM.TO vs. KUYAF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) is 14.83%, while Kuya Silver Corp (KUYAF) has a volatility of 28.26%. This indicates that AEM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KUYAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEM.TO | KUYAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.83% | 28.26% | -13.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.90% | 73.25% | -38.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.09% | 95.29% | -52.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.05% | 89.28% | -54.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.95% | 115.54% | -79.59% |
Dividends
AEM.TO vs. KUYAF - Dividend Comparison
AEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while KUYAF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEM.TO Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1.04% | 0.97% | 1.95% | 2.98% | 2.81% | 2.08% | 1.34% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 0.77% | 0.75% | 0.95% |
KUYAF Kuya Silver Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AEM.TO vs. KUYAF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Kuya Silver Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AEM.TO vs. KUYAF - Profitability Comparison
AEM.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.
KUYAF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kuya Silver Corp reported a gross profit of -432.43K and revenue of 1.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -29.9%.
AEM.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 62.4%.
KUYAF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kuya Silver Corp reported an operating income of -1.39M and revenue of 1.44M, resulting in an operating margin of -96.4%.
AEM.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.70B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.
KUYAF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kuya Silver Corp reported a net income of -1.22M and revenue of 1.44M, resulting in a net margin of -84.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AEM.TO and KUYAF have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AEM.TO and KUYAF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer