PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEM.TO vs. CNC.V
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AEM.TO vs. CNC.V - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) and Canada Nickel Company Inc (CNC.V). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEM.TO achieves a -2.49% return, which is significantly lower than CNC.V's 5.00% return.


AEM.TO

1D
-0.89%
1M
-14.34%
YTD
-2.49%
6M
-0.60%
1Y
41.16%
3Y*
52.05%
5Y*
24.22%
10Y*
15.27%

CNC.V

1D
-2.00%
1M
-12.50%
YTD
5.00%
6M
20.49%
1Y
47.00%
3Y*
4.45%
5Y*
-15.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEM.TO vs. CNC.V - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
-2.49%109.63%58.54%6.65%8.01%-23.56%35.37%
CNC.V
Canada Nickel Company Inc
5.00%52.17%-19.30%-44.39%-44.74%91.24%115.56%

Correlation

The correlation between AEM.TO and CNC.V is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020

0.17

Over the past year, AEM.TO and CNC.V have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AEM.TO:

CA$113.39B

CNC.V:

CA$333.53M

EPS

AEM.TO:

CA$10.65

CNC.V:

-CA$0.13

PB Ratio

AEM.TO:

4.32

CNC.V:

1.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

AEM.TO:

CA$13.56B

CNC.V:

CA$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

AEM.TO:

CA$8.26B

CNC.V:

CA$0.00

EBITDA (TTM)

AEM.TO:

CA$9.54B

CNC.V:

-CA$15.27M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEM.TO vs. CNC.V — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEM.TO
AEM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AEM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

CNC.V
CNC.V Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CNC.V Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNC.V Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNC.V Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CNC.V Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNC.V Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEM.TO vs. CNC.V - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) and Canada Nickel Company Inc (CNC.V). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AEM.TOCNC.VDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.18

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

1.07

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.18

2.03

+1.15

AEM.TO vs. CNC.V - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the CNC.V Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEM.TO and CNC.V, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AEM.TOCNC.VDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

0.68

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

-0.27

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.11

+0.14

Drawdowns

AEM.TO vs. CNC.V - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -70.33%, smaller than the maximum CNC.V drawdown of -83.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM.TO and CNC.V.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEM.TOCNC.VDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.33%

-83.14%

+12.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.29%

-44.09%

+9.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.29%

-64.25%

+29.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.35%

-80.68%

+38.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.29%

-66.51%

+32.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.16%

-55.12%

+25.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.96%

23.20%

-10.24%

Volatility

AEM.TO vs. CNC.V - Volatility Comparison

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.83% compared to Canada Nickel Company Inc (CNC.V) at 14.01%. This indicates that AEM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNC.V based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEM.TOCNC.VDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.83%

14.01%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.90%

49.07%

-14.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.09%

69.74%

-26.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.05%

60.42%

-25.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.95%

76.69%

-40.74%

Dividends

AEM.TO vs. CNC.V - Dividend Comparison

AEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while CNC.V has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.04%0.97%1.95%2.98%2.81%2.08%1.34%0.81%0.80%0.77%0.75%0.95%
CNC.V
Canada Nickel Company Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AEM.TO vs. CNC.V - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Canada Nickel Company Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
4.10B
0
(AEM.TO) Total Revenue
(CNC.V) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AEM.TO and CNC.V have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEM.TO and CNC.V

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer