PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEG vs. MUFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AEG vs. MUFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aegon N.V. (AEG) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEG achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly lower than MUFG's 25.60% return. Over the past 10 years, AEG has underperformed MUFG with an annualized return of 11.39%, while MUFG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.84% annualized return.


AEG

1D
-0.24%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
6.61%
6M
3.66%
1Y
20.46%
3Y*
25.46%
5Y*
18.27%
10Y*
11.39%

MUFG

1D
0.05%
1M
10.97%
YTD
25.60%
6M
25.13%
1Y
46.00%
3Y*
45.96%
5Y*
32.45%
10Y*
17.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEG vs. MUFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEG
Aegon N.V.
6.61%39.08%8.38%21.19%6.45%29.44%-10.42%5.37%-22.29%20.46%
MUFG
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
25.60%39.96%40.10%33.50%27.37%25.70%-15.99%11.50%-33.01%20.99%

Correlation

The correlation between AEG and MUFG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2001

0.42

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AEG:

$12.43B

MUFG:

$222.81B

EPS

AEG:

$1.07

MUFG:

$214.15

PE Ratio

AEG:

7.66

MUFG:

0.09

PEG Ratio

AEG:

0.22

MUFG:

0.00

PS Ratio

AEG:

0.28

MUFG:

0.02

PB Ratio

AEG:

1.65

MUFG:

0.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

AEG:

$45.17B

MUFG:

$13.21T

Gross Profit (TTM)

AEG:

$45.17B

MUFG:

$7.24T

EBITDA (TTM)

AEG:

$1.06B

MUFG:

$3.34T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEG vs. MUFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEG
AEG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEG Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEG Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

MUFG
MUFG Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MUFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUFG Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MUFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUFG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEG vs. MUFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aegon N.V. (AEG) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AEGMUFGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.30

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

2.67

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.77

7.49

-3.72

AEG vs. MUFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEG Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the MUFG Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEG and MUFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AEGMUFGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

1.79

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

1.12

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.64

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.18

+0.03

Drawdowns

AEG vs. MUFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEG drawdown since its inception was -94.91%, which is greater than MUFG's maximum drawdown of -76.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEG and MUFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEGMUFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.91%

-76.75%

-18.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.65%

-17.28%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.37%

-26.56%

+8.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.56%

-32.81%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.11%

-57.62%

-13.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.55%

-0.65%

-62.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.67%

-43.56%

-9.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.45%

6.16%

-0.71%

Volatility

AEG vs. MUFG - Volatility Comparison

Aegon N.V. (AEG) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG) at 5.66%. This indicates that AEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEGMUFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

5.66%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.38%

19.14%

+1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.40%

25.83%

-0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.81%

29.05%

+1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.66%

27.88%

+7.78%

Dividends

AEG vs. MUFG - Dividend Comparison

AEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, more than MUFG's 1.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEG
Aegon N.V.
5.37%5.72%5.93%4.89%4.08%3.37%1.80%7.37%7.02%4.74%5.30%4.72%
MUFG
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.13%3.12%2.50%2.90%3.36%2.18%2.62%0.00%0.00%2.20%2.70%2.34%

Financials

AEG vs. MUFG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aegon N.V. and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00T2.00T3.00T4.00T20222023202420252026
19.00B
3.59T
(AEG) Total Revenue
(MUFG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AEG vs. MUFG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Aegon N.V. and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
58.3%
Portfolio components
AEG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aegon N.V. reported a gross profit of 19.00B and revenue of 19.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

MUFG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.09T and revenue of 3.59T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.3%.

AEG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aegon N.V. reported an operating income of 365.28M and revenue of 19.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.

MUFG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 841.39B and revenue of 3.59T, resulting in an operating margin of 23.4%.

AEG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aegon N.V. reported a net income of 389.10M and revenue of 19.00B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.

MUFG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 624.99B and revenue of 3.59T, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AEG and MUFG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AEG has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to MUFG (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEG dropped -94.91% vs MUFG's -76.75%.

MUFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEG and MUFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer