PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADSK vs. ZTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADSK vs. ZTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) and Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADSK achieves a -23.98% return, which is significantly higher than ZTS's -36.81% return. Over the past 10 years, ADSK has outperformed ZTS with an annualized return of 14.89%, while ZTS has yielded a comparatively lower 6.09% annualized return.


ADSK

1D
-2.14%
1M
-7.96%
YTD
-23.98%
6M
-25.33%
1Y
-24.45%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
-3.97%
10Y*
14.89%

ZTS

1D
-0.78%
1M
-4.84%
YTD
-36.81%
6M
-32.72%
1Y
-52.96%
3Y*
-20.57%
5Y*
-14.04%
10Y*
6.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADSK vs. ZTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADSK
Autodesk, Inc.
-23.98%0.15%21.39%30.29%-33.54%-7.91%66.43%42.65%22.68%41.64%
ZTS
Zoetis Inc.
-36.81%-21.75%-16.63%35.91%-39.51%48.26%25.76%55.71%19.45%35.55%

Correlation

The correlation between ADSK and ZTS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2013

0.42

The correlation between ADSK and ZTS shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.44 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADSK:

$47.71B

ZTS:

$33.29B

EPS

ADSK:

$6.84

ZTS:

$6.04

PE Ratio

ADSK:

32.92

ZTS:

13.04

PEG Ratio

ADSK:

1.27

ZTS:

1.46

PS Ratio

ADSK:

6.42

ZTS:

3.63

PB Ratio

ADSK:

14.96

ZTS:

10.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADSK:

$7.51B

ZTS:

$9.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADSK:

$6.84B

ZTS:

$6.73B

EBITDA (TTM)

ADSK:

$2.14B

ZTS:

$3.95B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADSK vs. ZTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADSK
ADSK Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ADSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADSK Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ADSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADSK Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

ZTS
ZTS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
ZTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADSK vs. ZTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) and Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADSKZTSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

0.65

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

-0.96

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

-2.06

+0.65

ADSK vs. ZTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADSK Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is higher than the ZTS Sharpe Ratio of -1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADSK and ZTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADSKZTSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.75

-1.49

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

-0.49

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.23

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.31

+0.02

Drawdowns

ADSK vs. ZTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADSK drawdown since its inception was -76.92%, which is greater than ZTS's maximum drawdown of -68.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADSK and ZTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADSKZTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.92%

-68.48%

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.15%

-55.35%

+22.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.15%

-61.77%

+28.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.99%

-68.48%

+16.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.99%

-68.48%

+16.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.25%

-66.52%

+32.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.62%

-14.79%

-7.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.31%

26.22%

-8.91%

Volatility

ADSK vs. ZTS - Volatility Comparison

Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) and Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) have volatilities of 12.22% and 12.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADSKZTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.22%

12.29%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.90%

31.20%

-4.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.84%

35.61%

-2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.06%

28.74%

+6.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.44%

27.08%

+9.36%

Dividends

ADSK vs. ZTS - Dividend Comparison

ADSK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADSK
Autodesk, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZTS
Zoetis Inc.
2.61%1.59%1.06%0.76%0.89%0.41%0.48%0.50%0.59%0.58%0.71%0.69%

Financials

ADSK vs. ZTS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Autodesk, Inc. and Zoetis Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
1.93B
2.26B
(ADSK) Total Revenue
(ZTS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ADSK vs. ZTS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Autodesk, Inc. and Zoetis Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
91.0%
71.7%
Portfolio components
ADSK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autodesk, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.76B and revenue of 1.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.0%.

ZTS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoetis Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.62B and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.

ADSK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autodesk, Inc. reported an operating income of 541.00M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.0%.

ZTS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoetis Inc. reported an operating income of 853.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.7%.

ADSK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autodesk, Inc. reported a net income of 491.00M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in a net margin of 25.4%.

ZTS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoetis Inc. reported a net income of 601.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ADSK and ZTS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZTS has higher volatility (12.29%) compared to ADSK (12.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADSK dropped -76.92% vs ZTS's -68.48%.

ADSK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.75 vs -1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADSK and ZTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer