PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADP vs. QUBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADP vs. QUBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) and Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADP achieves a -10.21% return, which is significantly lower than QUBT's 1.85% return.


ADP

1D
-1.24%
1M
7.55%
YTD
-10.21%
6M
-10.14%
1Y
-28.14%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
5.16%
10Y*
12.50%

QUBT

1D
4.97%
1M
8.85%
YTD
1.85%
6M
-19.68%
1Y
-23.72%
3Y*
90.15%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADP vs. QUBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ADP
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
-10.21%-10.18%28.41%-0.25%-1.29%42.60%5.86%32.71%-1.85%
QUBT
Quantum Computing, Inc.
1.85%-38.01%1,712.51%-39.53%-55.72%-75.83%370.33%0.00%-42.31%

Correlation

The correlation between ADP and QUBT is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2018

0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADP:

$92.16B

QUBT:

$2.34B

EPS

ADP:

$10.72

QUBT:

-$0.21

PS Ratio

ADP:

4.30

QUBT:

451.06

PB Ratio

ADP:

14.51

QUBT:

1.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADP:

$21.60B

QUBT:

$4.33M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADP:

$10.26B

QUBT:

-$667.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

ADP:

$6.51B

QUBT:

-$52.52M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADP vs. QUBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADP
ADP Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
ADP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADP Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADP Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ADP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADP Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

QUBT
QUBT Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
QUBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUBT Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
QUBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUBT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADP vs. QUBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) and Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADPQUBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.04

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

-0.32

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.33

-0.49

-0.83

ADP vs. QUBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADP Sharpe Ratio is -1.16, which is lower than the QUBT Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADP and QUBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADPQUBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.16

-0.22

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.07

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.06

+0.48

Drawdowns

ADP vs. QUBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADP drawdown since its inception was -59.51%, smaller than the maximum QUBT drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADP and QUBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADPQUBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.51%

-97.53%

+38.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.25%

-74.37%

+35.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.78%

-82.40%

+41.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.78%

-95.63%

+54.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.14%

-59.31%

+31.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.59%

-72.96%

+60.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.88%

48.08%

-25.20%

Volatility

ADP vs. QUBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) is 9.30%, while Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) has a volatility of 36.37%. This indicates that ADP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADPQUBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.30%

36.37%

-27.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.42%

67.03%

-46.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.35%

106.87%

-82.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.05%

133.10%

-111.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.48%

177.68%

-153.20%

Dividends

ADP vs. QUBT - Dividend Comparison

ADP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, while QUBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADP
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
2.83%2.46%1.96%2.21%1.83%1.55%2.08%1.92%2.14%2.00%2.10%2.36%
QUBT
Quantum Computing, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ADP vs. QUBT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Automatic Data Processing, Inc. and Quantum Computing, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.94B
3.69M
(ADP) Total Revenue
(QUBT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ADP and QUBT have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QUBT has higher volatility (36.37%) compared to ADP (9.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADP dropped -59.51% vs QUBT's -97.53%.

QUBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADP and QUBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer