PortfoliosLab logo
ADN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ADN.TO and SRU-UN.TO is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ADN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acadian Timber Corp. (ADN.TO) and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ADN.TO:

0.43

SRU-UN.TO:

1.26

Sortino Ratio

ADN.TO:

0.54

SRU-UN.TO:

1.86

Omega Ratio

ADN.TO:

1.07

SRU-UN.TO:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

ADN.TO:

0.59

SRU-UN.TO:

0.80

Martin Ratio

ADN.TO:

1.30

SRU-UN.TO:

4.03

Ulcer Index

ADN.TO:

3.66%

SRU-UN.TO:

4.83%

Daily Std Dev

ADN.TO:

14.58%

SRU-UN.TO:

16.07%

Max Drawdown

ADN.TO:

-50.63%

SRU-UN.TO:

-68.25%

Current Drawdown

ADN.TO:

-0.95%

SRU-UN.TO:

-4.45%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADN.TO:

CA$314.74M

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$4.37B

EPS

ADN.TO:

CA$1.10

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$1.45

PE Ratio

ADN.TO:

16.05

SRU-UN.TO:

17.68

PS Ratio

ADN.TO:

2.71

SRU-UN.TO:

4.50

PB Ratio

ADN.TO:

0.93

SRU-UN.TO:

0.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADN.TO:

CA$112.21M

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$930.46M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADN.TO:

CA$34.93M

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$553.57M

EBITDA (TTM)

ADN.TO:

CA$16.05M

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$228.80M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADN.TO achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly lower than SRU-UN.TO's 6.43% return. Over the past 10 years, ADN.TO has outperformed SRU-UN.TO with an annualized return of 6.00%, while SRU-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 4.91% annualized return.


ADN.TO

YTD

3.19%

1M

4.43%

6M

1.42%

1Y

6.17%

5Y*

13.13%

10Y*

6.00%

SRU-UN.TO

YTD

6.43%

1M

4.29%

6M

5.48%

1Y

20.11%

5Y*

14.14%

10Y*

4.91%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ADN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADN.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ADN.TO is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ADN.TO is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ADN.TO is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ADN.TO is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ADN.TO is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ADN.TO is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SRU-UN.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SRU-UN.TO is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SRU-UN.TO is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SRU-UN.TO is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SRU-UN.TO is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SRU-UN.TO is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SRU-UN.TO is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ADN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acadian Timber Corp. (ADN.TO) and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ADN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the SRU-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADN.TO and SRU-UN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ADN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

ADN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, less than SRU-UN.TO's 7.08% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ADN.TO
Acadian Timber Corp.
6.56%6.66%6.76%7.75%6.05%7.20%6.97%7.42%5.64%5.45%4.60%5.46%
SRU-UN.TO
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust
7.08%7.36%7.28%6.91%5.75%8.02%5.81%5.72%5.54%5.15%5.34%6.15%

Drawdowns

ADN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADN.TO drawdown since its inception was -50.63%, smaller than the maximum SRU-UN.TO drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADN.TO and SRU-UN.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ADN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Acadian Timber Corp. (ADN.TO) is 1.80%, while SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that ADN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRU-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ADN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acadian Timber Corp. and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20212022202320242025
24.83M
229.34M
(ADN.TO) Total Revenue
(SRU-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

ADN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Acadian Timber Corp. and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
30.1%
59.6%
(ADN.TO) Gross Margin
(SRU-UN.TO) Gross Margin
ADN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Acadian Timber Corp. reported a gross profit of 7.47M and revenue of 24.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.1%.

SRU-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 136.79M and revenue of 229.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.6%.

ADN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Acadian Timber Corp. reported an operating income of 4.42M and revenue of 24.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.

SRU-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 126.26M and revenue of 229.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.

ADN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Acadian Timber Corp. reported a net income of 3.66M and revenue of 24.83M, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.

SRU-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of -7.86M and revenue of 229.34M, resulting in a net margin of -3.4%.