ADMA vs. DECK
ADMA (ADMA Biologics, Inc.) and DECK (Deckers Outdoor Corporation) are both stocks. ADMA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while DECK operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, ADMA returned 1.08%/yr vs 28.25%/yr for DECK. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ADMA vs. DECK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADMA achieves a -55.81% return, which is significantly lower than DECK's 5.85% return. Over the past 10 years, ADMA has underperformed DECK with an annualized return of 1.08%, while DECK has yielded a comparatively higher 28.25% annualized return.
ADMA
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- -55.81%
- 6M
- -58.43%
- 1Y
- -60.89%
- 3Y*
- 28.26%
- 5Y*
- 34.37%
- 10Y*
- 1.08%
DECK
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 5.85%
- 6M
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- 0.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.47%
- 5Y*
- 15.25%
- 10Y*
- 28.25%
ADMA vs. DECK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADMA ADMA Biologics, Inc. | -55.81% | 6.36% | 279.42% | 16.49% | 175.18% | -27.69% | -51.25% | 67.36% | -25.55% | -37.30% |
DECK Deckers Outdoor Corporation | 5.85% | -48.95% | 82.30% | 67.46% | 8.97% | 27.73% | 69.83% | 31.97% | 59.44% | 44.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADMA and DECK is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2013 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
ADMA:
$1.93B
DECK:
$15.53B
ADMA:
$0.68
DECK:
$6.98
ADMA:
11.91
DECK:
15.72
ADMA:
3.86
DECK:
2.94
ADMA:
4.95
DECK:
6.21
ADMA:
$509.86M
DECK:
$5.47B
ADMA:
$312.42M
DECK:
$3.16B
ADMA:
$218.74M
DECK:
$1.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADMA vs. DECK — Risk / Return Rank
ADMA
DECK
ADMA vs. DECK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ADMA | DECK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.04 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 0.01 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.81 | 0.03 | -1.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ADMA | DECK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.12 | 0.01 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.35 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 | 0.67 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.24 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
ADMA vs. DECK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADMA drawdown since its inception was -91.28%, roughly equal to the maximum DECK drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADMA and DECK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADMA | DECK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.28% | -94.36% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.25% | -35.81% | -29.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.99% | -64.35% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.99% | -64.35% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.11% | -64.35% | -21.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.12% | -50.82% | -16.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.05% | -40.35% | -12.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.62% | 16.94% | +16.68% |
Volatility
ADMA vs. DECK - Volatility Comparison
ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) have volatilities of 11.89% and 11.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADMA | DECK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.89% | 11.51% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.36% | 31.06% | +14.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.73% | 45.42% | +9.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.46% | 43.98% | +15.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.05% | 42.47% | +26.58% |
Dividends
ADMA vs. DECK - Dividend Comparison
Neither ADMA nor DECK has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ADMA vs. DECK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Deckers Outdoor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ADMA vs. DECK - Profitability Comparison
ADMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 80.75M and revenue of 114.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.5%.
DECK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a gross profit of 644.64M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.
ADMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported an operating income of 58.27M and revenue of 114.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.9%.
DECK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported an operating income of 156.73M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
ADMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported a net income of 45.33M and revenue of 114.49M, resulting in a net margin of 39.6%.
DECK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a net income of 135.57M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ADMA and DECK have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ADMA has higher volatility (11.89%) compared to DECK (11.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADMA dropped -91.28% vs DECK's -94.36%.
DECK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.01 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ADMA and DECK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer