PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWX vs. IDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWX vs. IDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ACWX having a 11.20% return and IDV slightly lower at 10.84%. Over the past 10 years, ACWX has underperformed IDV with an annualized return of 9.49%, while IDV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.33% annualized return.


ACWX

1D
0.99%
1M
-1.50%
YTD
11.20%
6M
13.60%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
18.01%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
9.49%

IDV

1D
0.23%
1M
-2.36%
YTD
10.84%
6M
14.01%
1Y
33.84%
3Y*
24.24%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
10.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWX vs. IDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
11.20%32.59%5.17%15.63%-16.07%7.67%10.29%21.05%-13.99%27.20%
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF
10.84%52.16%4.00%10.32%-6.40%12.00%-5.94%23.56%-10.37%19.74%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWX and IDV is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2008

0.90

The correlation between ACWX and IDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ACWX vs. IDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACWX
IDV

Financial Services

23.3%
30.1%

Technology

22.4%
0.9%

Industrials

14.0%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
9.6%

Healthcare

6.7%

-

Basic Materials

6.7%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
7.2%

Energy

4.8%
15.6%

Communication Services

4.7%
10.0%

Utilities

2.8%
11.8%

Real Estate

1.2%
2.4%

Financial Services

ACWX
23.3%
IDV
30.1%

Technology

ACWX
22.4%
IDV
0.9%

Industrials

ACWX
14.0%
IDV
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ACWX
7.3%
IDV
9.6%

Healthcare

ACWX
6.7%
IDV

-

Basic Materials

ACWX
6.7%
IDV
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

ACWX
5.0%
IDV
7.2%

Energy

ACWX
4.8%
IDV
15.6%

Communication Services

ACWX
4.7%
IDV
10.0%

Utilities

ACWX
2.8%
IDV
11.8%

Real Estate

ACWX
1.2%
IDV
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWX vs. IDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWX
ACWX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ACWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

IDV
IDV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWX vs. IDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACWXIDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.47

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

3.99

-1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.17

15.00

-5.83

ACWX vs. IDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the IDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWX and IDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACWXIDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.63

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.76

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.58

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.21

+0.01

Drawdowns

ACWX vs. IDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWX drawdown since its inception was -60.40%, smaller than the maximum IDV drawdown of -70.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWX and IDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWXIDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.40%

-70.14%

+9.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.42%

-8.52%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-11.86%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.07%

-29.19%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.38%

-42.50%

+7.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.74%

-4.08%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.33%

-15.39%

+2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.26%

+0.69%

Volatility

ACWX vs. IDV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) at 3.91%. This indicates that ACWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWXIDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.26%

3.91%

+2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.90%

10.71%

+3.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.05%

12.96%

+3.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.38%

15.56%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.42%

17.94%

-0.52%

ACWX vs. IDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than IDV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACWX vs. IDV - Dividend Comparison

ACWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than IDV's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
2.54%2.82%2.97%2.96%2.68%2.74%1.88%3.22%2.60%2.40%2.77%2.51%
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF
4.51%4.94%6.46%6.51%7.33%5.78%5.47%5.15%5.93%4.52%4.69%5.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACWX and IDV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACWX has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to IDV (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWX dropped -60.40% vs IDV's -70.14%.

On 10-year performance, IDV leads with 10.33% vs 9.49% for ACWX. On fees, ACWX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, IDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDV has performed better with a 10.33% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACWX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IDV.

IDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 2.54% for ACWX.

ACWX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IDV is Global Equities. ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWX and 0.49% for IDV.

IDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWX and IDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer