PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWI vs. EFV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWI vs. EFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWI achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly higher than EFV's 8.07% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWI has outperformed EFV with an annualized return of 12.71%, while EFV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.94% annualized return.


ACWI

1D
0.34%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
9.49%
6M
10.24%
1Y
25.23%
3Y*
19.98%
5Y*
10.81%
10Y*
12.71%

EFV

1D
0.35%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
8.07%
6M
12.00%
1Y
25.73%
3Y*
21.26%
5Y*
11.92%
10Y*
9.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWI vs. EFV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
9.49%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
8.07%42.22%5.35%18.85%-5.22%11.08%-2.97%15.80%-14.67%21.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWI and EFV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008

0.89

The correlation between ACWI and EFV shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (3 years) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ACWI vs. EFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACWI
EFV

Technology

29.4%
3.2%

Financial Services

16.1%
37.3%

Industrials

10.9%
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
6.0%

Communication Services

9.0%
4.4%

Healthcare

8.1%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
9.5%

Energy

4.2%
6.8%

Basic Materials

3.7%
6.5%

Utilities

2.6%
5.7%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.7%

Technology

ACWI
29.4%
EFV
3.2%

Financial Services

ACWI
16.1%
EFV
37.3%

Industrials

ACWI
10.9%
EFV
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ACWI
9.3%
EFV
6.0%

Communication Services

ACWI
9.0%
EFV
4.4%

Healthcare

ACWI
8.1%
EFV
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

ACWI
5.0%
EFV
9.5%

Energy

ACWI
4.2%
EFV
6.8%

Basic Materials

ACWI
3.7%
EFV
6.5%

Utilities

ACWI
2.6%
EFV
5.7%

Real Estate

ACWI
1.8%
EFV
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWI vs. EFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

EFV
EFV Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFV Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
EFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWI vs. EFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACWIEFVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.37

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.58

8.79

+2.79

ACWI vs. EFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWI Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the EFV Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWI and EFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACWIEFVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

1.80

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.75

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.56

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.26

+0.16

Drawdowns

ACWI vs. EFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWI drawdown since its inception was -56.00%, smaller than the maximum EFV drawdown of -63.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWI and EFV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWIEFVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.00%

-63.94%

+7.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.73%

-10.90%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.55%

-13.72%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.42%

-25.84%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.53%

-43.16%

+9.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

-3.47%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.61%

-14.82%

+6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

2.93%

-0.75%

Volatility

ACWI vs. EFV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) at 3.81%. This indicates that ACWI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWIEFVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

3.81%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.76%

11.74%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

14.35%

-1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

15.98%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

17.87%

-0.73%

ACWI vs. EFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWI has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than EFV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACWI vs. EFV - Dividend Comparison

ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than EFV's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.42%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
3.85%4.16%4.66%4.36%4.17%4.07%2.42%4.62%4.56%3.56%3.28%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACWI and EFV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACWI has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to EFV (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWI dropped -56.00% vs EFV's -63.94%.

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.71% vs 9.94% for EFV. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, EFV has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 9.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EFV.

EFV has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 1.42% for ACWI.

ACWI is categorized as Global Equities, while EFV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index, while EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWI and 0.39% for EFV.

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWI and EFV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer