ACHR vs. GTX
ACHR (Archer Aviation Inc.) and GTX (Garrett Motion Inc.) are both stocks. ACHR operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while GTX operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, ACHR returned -10.82%/yr vs 33.47%/yr for GTX. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ACHR vs. GTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACHR achieves a -23.80% return, which is significantly lower than GTX's 86.21% return.
ACHR
- 1D
- 3.43%
- 1M
- -11.57%
- YTD
- -23.80%
- 6M
- -33.45%
- 1Y
- -43.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.81%
- 5Y*
- -10.82%
- 10Y*
- —
GTX
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 11.48%
- YTD
- 86.21%
- 6M
- 97.18%
- 1Y
- 221.55%
- 3Y*
- 62.84%
- 5Y*
- 33.47%
- 10Y*
- —
ACHR vs. GTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACHR Archer Aviation Inc. | -23.80% | -22.87% | 58.79% | 228.34% | -69.04% | -39.96% | -0.89% |
GTX Garrett Motion Inc. | 86.21% | 97.23% | -6.62% | 26.90% | -5.11% | 81.26% | 4.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACHR and GTX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2020 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
ACHR:
$4.39B
GTX:
$6.23B
ACHR:
-$1.36
GTX:
$1.72
ACHR:
1.65K
GTX:
2.38
ACHR:
$1.90M
GTX:
$2.71B
ACHR:
$300.00K
GTX:
$855.00M
ACHR:
-$712.00M
GTX:
$452.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACHR vs. GTX — Risk / Return Rank
ACHR
GTX
ACHR vs. GTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACHR | GTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.79 | -0.87 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 11.22 | -11.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 36.36 | -37.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACHR | GTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 | 4.67 | -5.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | 0.81 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.12 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
ACHR vs. GTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACHR drawdown since its inception was -90.49%, roughly equal to the maximum GTX drawdown of -93.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACHR and GTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACHR | GTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.49% | -93.08% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.78% | -19.87% | -43.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.78% | -26.82% | -36.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.00% | -31.66% | -52.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.57% | -4.63% | -61.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.50% | -50.96% | -11.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.38% | 6.12% | +34.26% |
Volatility
ACHR vs. GTX - Volatility Comparison
Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) has a higher volatility of 19.42% compared to Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) at 14.68%. This indicates that ACHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACHR | GTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.42% | 14.68% | +4.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.60% | 34.96% | +8.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.28% | 47.87% | +23.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 84.22% | 41.53% | +42.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.17% | 63.96% | +18.21% |
Dividends
ACHR vs. GTX - Dividend Comparison
ACHR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACHR Archer Aviation Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GTX Garrett Motion Inc. | 0.93% | 1.49% |
Financials
ACHR vs. GTX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Archer Aviation Inc. and Garrett Motion Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ACHR and GTX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACHR has higher volatility (19.42%) compared to GTX (14.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACHR dropped -90.49% vs GTX's -93.08%.
GTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.67 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACHR and GTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer