ACHR vs. CLF
ACHR (Archer Aviation Inc.) and CLF (Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.) are both stocks. ACHR operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while CLF operates in Steel (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, ACHR returned -10.82%/yr vs -11.40%/yr for CLF. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ACHR vs. CLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACHR achieves a -23.80% return, which is significantly lower than CLF's -4.52% return.
ACHR
- 1D
- 3.43%
- 1M
- -11.57%
- YTD
- -23.80%
- 6M
- -33.45%
- 1Y
- -43.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.81%
- 5Y*
- -10.82%
- 10Y*
- —
CLF
- 1D
- -6.28%
- 1M
- 15.06%
- YTD
- -4.52%
- 6M
- 2.51%
- 1Y
- 66.84%
- 3Y*
- -7.46%
- 5Y*
- -11.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
ACHR vs. CLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACHR Archer Aviation Inc. | -23.80% | -22.87% | 58.79% | 228.34% | -69.04% | -39.96% | -0.89% |
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | -4.52% | 41.28% | -53.97% | 26.75% | -26.00% | 49.52% | 4.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACHR and CLF is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2020 | 0.29 |
Fundamentals
ACHR:
$4.39B
CLF:
$7.16B
ACHR:
-$1.36
CLF:
-$2.37
ACHR:
1.65K
CLF:
0.34
ACHR:
2.11
CLF:
1.23
ACHR:
$1.90M
CLF:
$18.90B
ACHR:
$300.00K
CLF:
-$528.00M
ACHR:
-$712.00M
CLF:
$134.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACHR vs. CLF — Risk / Return Rank
ACHR
CLF
ACHR vs. CLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACHR | CLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.21 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 1.30 | -1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 2.68 | -3.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACHR | CLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 | 0.98 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | -0.19 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.13 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
ACHR vs. CLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACHR drawdown since its inception was -90.49%, smaller than the maximum CLF drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACHR and CLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACHR | CLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.49% | -98.78% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.78% | -51.67% | -12.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.78% | -74.46% | +10.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.00% | -82.37% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -82.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.57% | -87.07% | +20.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.50% | -47.61% | -14.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.38% | 25.01% | +15.37% |
Volatility
ACHR vs. CLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) is 19.42%, while Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) has a volatility of 20.72%. This indicates that ACHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACHR | CLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.42% | 20.72% | -1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.60% | 46.41% | -2.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.28% | 68.41% | +2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 84.22% | 59.53% | +24.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.17% | 62.05% | +20.12% |
Dividends
ACHR vs. CLF - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACHR nor CLF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACHR Archer Aviation Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 3.10% |
Financials
ACHR vs. CLF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Archer Aviation Inc. and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ACHR and CLF have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLF has higher volatility (20.72%) compared to ACHR (19.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACHR dropped -90.49% vs CLF's -98.78%.
CLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACHR and CLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer