PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABDN.L vs. BAG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ABDN.L vs. BAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Abrdn plc (ABDN.L) and A.G.Barr plc (BAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABDN.L achieves a 19.18% return, which is significantly higher than BAG.L's 0.99% return. Over the past 10 years, ABDN.L has underperformed BAG.L with an annualized return of 3.37%, while BAG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 3.88% annualized return.


ABDN.L

1D
-0.92%
1M
7.36%
YTD
19.18%
6M
25.02%
1Y
38.53%
3Y*
12.60%
5Y*
4.96%
10Y*
3.37%

BAG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
0.99%
6M
0.67%
1Y
-8.06%
3Y*
10.29%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
3.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABDN.L vs. BAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABDN.L
Abrdn plc
19.18%57.94%-12.84%2.11%-14.88%-9.77%-5.36%38.83%-44.96%24.70%
BAG.L
A.G.Barr plc
0.99%5.05%21.87%-1.23%5.31%1.72%-10.52%-24.80%21.06%35.93%

Correlation

The correlation between ABDN.L and BAG.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2006

0.18

Fundamentals

EPS

ABDN.L:

£0.70

BAG.L:

£0.77

PE Ratio

ABDN.L:

3.39

BAG.L:

7.94

PEG Ratio

ABDN.L:

0.00

BAG.L:

0.56

PS Ratio

ABDN.L:

0.67

BAG.L:

0.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABDN.L:

£3.20B

BAG.L:

£857.70M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABDN.L:

£3.05B

BAG.L:

£340.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

ABDN.L:

£796.00M

BAG.L:

£139.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABDN.L vs. BAG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABDN.L
ABDN.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ABDN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABDN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABDN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ABDN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABDN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

BAG.L
BAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABDN.L vs. BAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn plc (ABDN.L) and A.G.Barr plc (BAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABDN.LBAG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.94

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

-0.60

+3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.62

-1.08

+8.70

ABDN.L vs. BAG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABDN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the BAG.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABDN.L and BAG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABDN.LBAG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

-0.44

+1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.27

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.14

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.18

-0.05

Drawdowns

ABDN.L vs. BAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABDN.L drawdown since its inception was -64.13%, smaller than the maximum BAG.L drawdown of -93.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABDN.L and BAG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABDN.LBAG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.13%

-93.03%

+28.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.76%

-13.45%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.10%

-16.05%

-21.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.49%

-24.81%

-25.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.82%

-61.52%

-0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.50%

-26.68%

+12.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.92%

-21.35%

-7.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.04%

7.47%

-2.43%

Volatility

ABDN.L vs. BAG.L - Volatility Comparison

Abrdn plc (ABDN.L) has a higher volatility of 8.11% compared to A.G.Barr plc (BAG.L) at 5.07%. This indicates that ABDN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABDN.LBAG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.11%

5.07%

+3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.85%

14.75%

+9.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.65%

18.49%

+10.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.62%

22.62%

+10.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.91%

27.07%

+6.84%

Dividends

ABDN.L vs. BAG.L - Dividend Comparison

ABDN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, more than BAG.L's 3.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABDN.L
Abrdn plc
6.18%7.10%10.34%8.17%7.71%6.06%7.68%6.58%10.54%5.33%5.78%5.12%
BAG.L
A.G.Barr plc
3.04%2.76%2.55%2.58%2.35%1.93%0.00%2.89%1.99%2.19%2.69%2.32%

Financials

ABDN.L vs. BAG.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abrdn plc and A.G.Barr plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B202120222023202420252026
1.04B
209.20M
(ABDN.L) Total Revenue
(BAG.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ABDN.L and BAG.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABDN.L and BAG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer