PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABBV vs. INVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ABBV vs. INVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) and Innoviva, Inc. (INVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABBV achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than INVA's 11.71% return. Over the past 10 years, ABBV has outperformed INVA with an annualized return of 18.63%, while INVA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.00% annualized return.


ABBV

1D
-1.83%
1M
10.68%
YTD
-0.77%
6M
1.62%
1Y
21.34%
3Y*
21.59%
5Y*
18.74%
10Y*
18.63%

INVA

1D
-0.84%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
11.71%
6M
6.33%
1Y
3.48%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
12.47%
10Y*
7.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABBV vs. INVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
-0.77%33.08%18.86%-0.23%24.01%32.43%27.72%1.47%-0.96%60.07%
INVA
Innoviva, Inc.
11.71%15.22%8.17%21.06%-23.19%39.23%-12.50%-18.85%22.97%32.62%

Correlation

The correlation between ABBV and INVA is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.26

The correlation between ABBV and INVA shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ABBV:

$395.73B

INVA:

$1.89B

EPS

ABBV:

$2.05

INVA:

$5.94

PE Ratio

ABBV:

108.68

INVA:

3.76

PS Ratio

ABBV:

6.30

INVA:

4.47

PB Ratio

ABBV:

14.39

INVA:

1.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABBV:

$62.82B

INVA:

$424.12M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABBV:

$46.15B

INVA:

$323.16M

EBITDA (TTM)

ABBV:

$17.96B

INVA:

$438.91M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABBV vs. INVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABBV
ABBV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ABBV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABBV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABBV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ABBV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABBV Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

INVA
INVA Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
INVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
INVA Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
INVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
INVA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABBV vs. INVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) and Innoviva, Inc. (INVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABBVINVADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.05

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

0.15

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.77

0.34

+2.43

ABBV vs. INVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABBV Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the INVA Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABBV and INVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABBVINVADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

0.12

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.46

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.21

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.05

+0.69

Drawdowns

ABBV vs. INVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABBV drawdown since its inception was -45.09%, smaller than the maximum INVA drawdown of -84.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABBV and INVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABBVINVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.09%

-84.32%

+39.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.32%

-23.53%

+6.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.74%

-23.53%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.92%

-47.01%

+25.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.09%

-59.57%

+14.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.55%

-30.17%

+23.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.72%

-44.65%

+33.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.72%

10.21%

-2.49%

Volatility

ABBV vs. INVA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) is 6.39%, while Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that ABBV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABBVINVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.39%

7.62%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.89%

16.91%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.33%

28.81%

-4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.91%

27.28%

-4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.74%

33.89%

-8.15%

Dividends

ABBV vs. INVA - Dividend Comparison

ABBV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, while INVA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
3.02%2.87%3.49%3.82%3.49%3.84%4.41%4.83%3.89%2.65%3.64%3.41%
INVA
Innoviva, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.12%

Financials

ABBV vs. INVA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AbbVie Inc. and Innoviva, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
15.00B
97.99M
(ABBV) Total Revenue
(INVA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ABBV and INVA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INVA has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to ABBV (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABBV dropped -45.09% vs INVA's -84.32%.

ABBV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABBV and INVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer