ABBNY vs. CMI
ABBNY (ABB Ltd) and CMI (Cummins Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — ABBNY in Electrical Equipment & Parts, CMI in Specialty Industrial Machinery. Over the past 10 years, ABBNY returned 21.38%/yr vs 22.34%/yr for CMI. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ABBNY vs. CMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABBNY achieves a 41.80% return, which is significantly higher than CMI's 32.64% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ABBNY having a 21.38% annualized return and CMI not far ahead at 22.34%.
ABBNY
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- 41.80%
- 6M
- 43.11%
- 1Y
- 82.41%
- 3Y*
- 41.86%
- 5Y*
- 27.12%
- 10Y*
- 21.38%
CMI
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- 32.64%
- 6M
- 33.36%
- 1Y
- 109.28%
- 3Y*
- 46.82%
- 5Y*
- 24.12%
- 10Y*
- 22.34%
ABBNY vs. CMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBNY ABB Ltd | 41.80% | 40.49% | 23.75% | 49.62% | -18.13% | 40.40% | 21.21% | 31.87% | -26.52% | 31.68% |
CMI Cummins Inc. | 32.64% | 49.36% | 48.92% | 1.72% | 14.09% | -1.68% | 30.50% | 38.04% | -22.06% | 32.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABBNY and CMI is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2001 | 0.49 |
The correlation between ABBNY and CMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
ABBNY:
$188.22B
CMI:
$93.37B
ABBNY:
$2.71
CMI:
$19.27
ABBNY:
38.10
CMI:
34.90
ABBNY:
3.84
CMI:
0.39
ABBNY:
5.28
CMI:
2.75
ABBNY:
12.75
CMI:
7.56
ABBNY:
$35.74B
CMI:
$33.89B
ABBNY:
$14.33B
CMI:
$8.60B
ABBNY:
$7.34B
CMI:
$4.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABBNY vs. CMI — Risk / Return Rank
ABBNY
CMI
ABBNY vs. CMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ABB Ltd (ABBNY) and Cummins Inc. (CMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABBNY | CMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.52 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.27 | 7.22 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.73 | 26.31 | -5.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABBNY | CMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79 | 3.33 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.86 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.79 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.38 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
ABBNY vs. CMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABBNY drawdown since its inception was -93.98%, which is greater than CMI's maximum drawdown of -75.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABBNY and CMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABBNY | CMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.98% | -75.66% | -18.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.71% | -15.23% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.26% | -30.48% | +10.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.07% | -30.48% | -5.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.98% | -44.05% | +0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.13% | -5.81% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.54% | -22.23% | -3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 4.17% | -0.18% |
Volatility
ABBNY vs. CMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ABB Ltd (ABBNY) is 10.45%, while Cummins Inc. (CMI) has a volatility of 12.18%. This indicates that ABBNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABBNY | CMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.45% | 12.18% | -1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.58% | 27.86% | -3.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.78% | 33.02% | -3.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.06% | 28.05% | -1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.43% | 28.26% | -2.83% |
Dividends
ABBNY vs. CMI - Dividend Comparison
ABBNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, which matches CMI's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBNY ABB Ltd | 1.18% | 1.39% | 1.79% | 2.07% | 2.88% | 2.29% | 2.77% | 3.31% | 4.35% | 2.84% | 3.47% | 4.21% |
CMI Cummins Inc. | 1.19% | 1.50% | 2.01% | 2.71% | 2.49% | 2.57% | 2.33% | 2.74% | 3.32% | 2.38% | 2.93% | 3.99% |
Financials
ABBNY vs. CMI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ABB Ltd and Cummins Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ABBNY vs. CMI - Profitability Comparison
ABBNY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ABB Ltd reported a gross profit of 3.44B and revenue of 8.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.
CMI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cummins Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.24B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.7%.
ABBNY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ABB Ltd reported an operating income of 1.43B and revenue of 8.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.
CMI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cummins Inc. reported an operating income of 949.00M and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
ABBNY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ABB Ltd reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 8.73B, resulting in a net margin of 15.2%.
CMI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cummins Inc. reported a net income of 654.00M and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ABBNY and CMI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMI has higher volatility (12.18%) compared to ABBNY (10.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABBNY dropped -93.98% vs CMI's -75.66%.
CMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABBNY and CMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer