PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AB vs. PFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AB vs. PFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) and Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AB achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly lower than PFG's 21.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AB having a 14.30% annualized return and PFG not far behind at 13.61%.


AB

1D
-1.64%
1M
-6.29%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
-8.47%
1Y
-0.43%
3Y*
11.52%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*
14.30%

PFG

1D
-0.18%
1M
5.34%
YTD
21.10%
6M
22.95%
1Y
41.47%
3Y*
17.87%
5Y*
14.05%
10Y*
13.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AB vs. PFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
-0.39%13.36%30.40%-2.29%-23.46%56.27%23.00%19.85%21.04%16.76%
PFG
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
21.10%18.38%1.87%-2.83%20.10%51.35%-5.19%29.71%-34.96%25.52%

Correlation

The correlation between AB and PFG is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2001

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between AB and PFG has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AB:

$3.39B

PFG:

$23.14B

EPS

AB:

$3.22

PFG:

$6.97

PE Ratio

AB:

11.38

PFG:

15.06

PS Ratio

AB:

14.16

PFG:

1.95

PB Ratio

AB:

2.69

PFG:

1.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

AB:

$250.00M

PFG:

$12.07B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AB:

$250.00M

PFG:

$5.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

AB:

$252.50M

PFG:

$1.39B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AB vs. PFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AB
AB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
AB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AB Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
AB Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

PFG
PFG Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFG Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AB vs. PFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) and Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABPFGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.33

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

3.48

-3.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.07

11.28

-11.34

AB vs. PFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AB Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the PFG Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AB and PFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABPFGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

1.92

-1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.53

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.43

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.23

+0.23

Drawdowns

AB vs. PFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AB drawdown since its inception was -87.65%, roughly equal to the maximum PFG drawdown of -91.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AB and PFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABPFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.65%

-91.50%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.68%

-11.96%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.84%

-22.43%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.76%

-29.32%

-16.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.08%

-64.73%

+6.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.44%

-0.18%

-10.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.21%

-21.85%

-4.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.68%

3.69%

+2.99%

Volatility

AB vs. PFG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) is 4.11%, while Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that AB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABPFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

4.90%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.51%

15.63%

+2.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.42%

21.73%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.24%

26.63%

+1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.40%

31.96%

+0.44%

Dividends

AB vs. PFG - Dividend Comparison

AB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.30%, more than PFG's 3.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
9.30%9.02%8.03%8.44%10.30%7.33%8.26%7.67%10.54%8.50%7.46%8.09%
PFG
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
3.04%3.49%3.68%3.30%3.05%3.37%4.52%3.96%4.75%2.65%2.78%3.33%

Financials

AB vs. PFG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. and Principal Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B202220232024202520260
135.60M
(AB) Total Revenue
(PFG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AB and PFG have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFG has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to AB (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AB dropped -87.65% vs PFG's -91.50%.

PFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AB and PFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer