AAXJ vs. EFAS

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

AAXJ (iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAXJ is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index, while EFAS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AAXJ returned 5.97%/yr vs 11.91%/yr for EFAS. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAXJ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for EFAS.

Performance

AAXJ vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAXJ achieves a 22.87% return, which is significantly higher than EFAS's 12.67% return.

AAXJ

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: -2.62%
• YTD: 22.87%
• 6M: 24.43%
• 1Y: 45.43%
• 3Y*: 21.57%
• 5Y*: 5.97%
• 10Y*: 9.86%

EFAS

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -1.74%
• YTD: 12.67%
• 6M: 17.33%
• 1Y: 27.94%
• 3Y*: 24.20%
• 5Y*: 11.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAXJ vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF	22.87%	31.53%	10.41%	4.79%	-20.35%	-5.73%	23.35%	17.93%	-15.04%	41.76%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	12.67%	46.83%	3.07%	14.65%	-8.00%	12.75%	-5.42%	14.60%	-11.60%	22.76%

Correlation

The correlation between AAXJ and EFAS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2016	0.54

The correlation between AAXJ and EFAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AAXJ vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AAXJ	EFAS
Technology	41.6%	0.1%
Financial Services	17.7%	30.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	1.9%
Industrials	8.3%	9.9%
Communication Services	6.9%	8.6%
Basic Materials	3.5%	1.8%
Healthcare	3.0%	0.1%
Energy	2.7%	13.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	8.1%
Utilities	1.8%	14.4%
Real Estate	1.7%	11.3%

Return for Risk

AAXJ vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAXJ

AAXJ Risk / Return Rank: 72
AAXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
AAXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
AAXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 76
AAXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
AAXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 74

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 86
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 83
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAXJ vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAXJ	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	2.61	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	3.65	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.45	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	5.29	-1.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.62	13.95	-1.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAXJ vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAXJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAXJ and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAXJ	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	2.61	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	0.77	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.56	-0.29

Drawdowns

AAXJ vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAXJ drawdown since its inception was -49.37%, which is greater than EFAS's maximum drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAXJ and EFAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAXJ	EFAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.37%	-44.38%	-4.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.66%	-5.30%	-8.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.74%	-11.84%	-7.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.64%	-28.81%	-11.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.32%	-3.26%	-4.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.02%	-7.07%	-6.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	2.01%	+1.60%

Volatility

AAXJ vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) has a higher volatility of 11.44% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 3.08%. This indicates that AAXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAXJ	EFAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.44%	3.08%	+8.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.19%	8.46%	+10.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.66%	10.78%	+10.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.22%	15.61%	+4.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.38%	18.33%	+2.05%

AAXJ vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAXJ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAXJ vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

AAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than EFAS's 4.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF	1.47%	1.81%	1.86%	1.95%	1.74%	2.21%	1.06%	1.83%	2.10%	1.99%	1.77%	2.44%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	4.74%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAXJ and EFAS in my portfolio?

AAXJ and EFAS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAXJ or EFAS?

AAXJ has higher volatility (11.44%) compared to EFAS (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAXJ dropped -49.37% vs EFAS's -44.38%.

Which ETF is better, AAXJ or EFAS?

On 5-year performance, EFAS leads with 11.91% vs 5.97% for AAXJ. On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAXJ or EFAS?

Over the 5-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 11.91% return vs 5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAXJ or EFAS?

EFAS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AAXJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAXJ or EFAS?

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 1.47% for AAXJ.

What is the main difference between AAXJ and EFAS?

AAXJ is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while EFAS is Foreign Large Cap Equities. AAXJ tracks MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index, while EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for AAXJ and 0.56% for EFAS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.