PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPL vs. XLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPL vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apple Inc (AAPL) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, AAPL has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 29.63%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.65% annualized return.


AAPL

1D
-1.89%
1M
2.90%
YTD
11.12%
6M
8.71%
1Y
48.46%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
19.46%
10Y*
29.63%

XLV

1D
-0.24%
1M
6.38%
YTD
-0.98%
6M
1.65%
1Y
15.62%
3Y*
7.16%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
9.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPL vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAPL
Apple Inc
11.12%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-0.98%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPL and XLV is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.38

The correlation between AAPL and XLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.42 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPL vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPL vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPLXLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.19

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

1.50

+2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.89

3.60

+5.29

AAPL vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPL Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPL and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPLXLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

1.05

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.41

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

0.58

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.46

-0.02

Drawdowns

AAPL vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and XLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPLXLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.80%

-39.17%

-42.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-10.47%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.36%

-17.11%

-16.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

-17.11%

-16.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

-28.40%

-10.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.33%

-4.32%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.60%

-7.12%

-22.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.48%

4.35%

+1.13%

Volatility

AAPL vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

Apple Inc (AAPL) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 5.02%. This indicates that AAPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPLXLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

5.02%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.99%

10.66%

+5.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.41%

14.99%

+7.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.47%

14.76%

+12.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.91%

16.58%

+12.33%

Dividends

AAPL vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than XLV's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.35%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.64%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPL and XLV have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPL has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to XLV (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPL dropped -81.80% vs XLV's -39.17%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPL and XLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer