PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPL vs. SNPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AAPL vs. SNPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apple Inc (AAPL) and Synopsys, Inc. (SNPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly higher than SNPS's 0.80% return. Over the past 10 years, AAPL has outperformed SNPS with an annualized return of 29.63%, while SNPS has yielded a comparatively lower 24.60% annualized return.


AAPL

1D
-1.89%
1M
2.90%
YTD
11.12%
6M
8.71%
1Y
48.46%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
19.46%
10Y*
29.63%

SNPS

1D
1.86%
1M
-8.33%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.66%
1Y
-2.58%
3Y*
2.57%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
24.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPL vs. SNPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAPL
Apple Inc
11.12%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%
SNPS
Synopsys, Inc.
0.80%-3.22%-5.74%61.27%-13.35%42.15%86.24%65.24%-1.17%44.82%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPL and SNPS is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 1992

0.36

The correlation between AAPL and SNPS shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.52 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AAPL:

$4.45T

SNPS:

$90.71B

EPS

AAPL:

$8.24

SNPS:

$4.57

PE Ratio

AAPL:

36.61

SNPS:

103.64

PEG Ratio

AAPL:

4.82

SNPS:

4.45

PS Ratio

AAPL:

9.94

SNPS:

9.23

PB Ratio

AAPL:

41.82

SNPS:

2.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

AAPL:

$451.44B

SNPS:

$8.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AAPL:

$216.07B

SNPS:

$6.38B

EBITDA (TTM)

AAPL:

$153.63B

SNPS:

$2.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPL vs. SNPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

SNPS
SNPS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SNPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNPS Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
SNPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNPS Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPL vs. SNPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and Synopsys, Inc. (SNPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPLSNPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.06

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

-0.06

+3.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.89

-0.10

+8.98

AAPL vs. SNPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPL Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the SNPS Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPL and SNPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPLSNPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

-0.05

+2.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.32

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

0.70

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.31

+0.13

Drawdowns

AAPL vs. SNPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, which is greater than SNPS's maximum drawdown of -60.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and SNPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPLSNPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.80%

-60.95%

-20.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-41.04%

+27.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.36%

-41.04%

+7.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

-41.04%

+7.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

-41.04%

+2.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.33%

-26.63%

+22.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.60%

-20.29%

-9.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.48%

25.93%

-20.45%

Volatility

AAPL vs. SNPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Apple Inc (AAPL) is 5.68%, while Synopsys, Inc. (SNPS) has a volatility of 13.85%. This indicates that AAPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPLSNPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

13.85%

-8.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.99%

30.93%

-14.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.41%

56.78%

-34.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.47%

40.81%

-13.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.91%

35.09%

-6.18%

Dividends

AAPL vs. SNPS - Dividend Comparison

AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while SNPS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.35%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
SNPS
Synopsys, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AAPL vs. SNPS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apple Inc and Synopsys, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20222023202420252026
111.18B
2.28B
(AAPL) Total Revenue
(SNPS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AAPL vs. SNPS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Apple Inc and Synopsys, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
49.3%
72.3%
Portfolio components
AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

SNPS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Synopsys, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.65B and revenue of 2.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.3%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

SNPS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Synopsys, Inc. reported an operating income of 120.43M and revenue of 2.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.

SNPS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Synopsys, Inc. reported a net income of 16.87M and revenue of 2.28B, resulting in a net margin of 0.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AAPL and SNPS have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNPS has higher volatility (13.85%) compared to AAPL (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPL dropped -81.80% vs SNPS's -60.95%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPL and SNPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer