AAPL vs. QBTS
AAPL (Apple Inc) and QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — AAPL in Consumer Electronics, QBTS in Computer Hardware. Over the past 3 years, AAPL returned 19.11%/yr vs 125.25%/yr for QBTS. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AAPL vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly higher than QBTS's -1.22% return.
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 48.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.11%
- 5Y*
- 19.46%
- 10Y*
- 29.63%
QBTS
- 1D
- 8.30%
- 1M
- 14.44%
- YTD
- -1.22%
- 6M
- -9.18%
- 1Y
- 38.72%
- 3Y*
- 125.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPL vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 11.12% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -21.29% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | -1.22% | 211.31% | 854.44% | -38.88% | -83.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPL and QBTS is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
AAPL:
$4.45T
QBTS:
$9.49B
AAPL:
$8.24
QBTS:
-$1.08
AAPL:
9.94
QBTS:
704.19
AAPL:
41.82
QBTS:
8.44
AAPL:
$451.44B
QBTS:
$12.44M
AAPL:
$216.07B
QBTS:
$8.25M
AAPL:
$153.63B
QBTS:
-$399.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPL vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank
AAPL
QBTS
AAPL vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPL | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.15 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 0.55 | +2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.89 | 0.96 | +7.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPL | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 0.36 | +1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.19 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
AAPL vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, smaller than the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and QBTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPL | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.80% | -96.67% | +14.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -71.01% | +57.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.36% | -79.17% | +45.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.33% | -42.32% | +37.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.60% | -65.80% | +36.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.48% | 40.50% | -35.02% |
Volatility
AAPL vs. QBTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Apple Inc (AAPL) is 5.68%, while D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a volatility of 42.76%. This indicates that AAPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPL | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.68% | 42.76% | -37.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.99% | 76.88% | -60.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.41% | 108.49% | -86.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.47% | 151.19% | -123.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.91% | 151.19% | -122.28% |
Dividends
AAPL vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison
AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while QBTS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AAPL vs. QBTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apple Inc and D-Wave Quantum Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPL and QBTS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTS has higher volatility (42.76%) compared to AAPL (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPL dropped -81.80% vs QBTS's -96.67%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPL and QBTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer