PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPL vs. MNT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPL vs. MNT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apple Inc (AAPL) and Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AAPL is traded in USD, while MNT.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the MNT.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly higher than MNT.TO's -5.98% return. Over the past 10 years, AAPL has outperformed MNT.TO with an annualized return of 29.63%, while MNT.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.25% annualized return.


AAPL

1D
-1.89%
1M
2.90%
YTD
11.12%
6M
8.71%
1Y
48.46%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
19.46%
10Y*
29.63%

MNT.TO

1D
-1.29%
1M
-11.09%
YTD
-5.98%
6M
-4.26%
1Y
23.05%
3Y*
30.07%
5Y*
17.30%
10Y*
12.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPL vs. MNT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAPL
Apple Inc
11.12%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%
MNT.TO
Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves
-5.98%68.94%33.51%6.13%3.93%-10.47%29.20%18.35%-2.35%13.19%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPL and MNT.TO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2012

-0.07

The correlation between AAPL and MNT.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (10 years) to 0.09 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPL vs. MNT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

MNT.TO
MNT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MNT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPL vs. MNT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPLMNT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.16

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

0.90

+2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.89

2.26

+6.63

AAPL vs. MNT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPL Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the MNT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPL and MNT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPLMNT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

0.75

+1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.82

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

0.60

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.28

+0.16

Drawdowns

AAPL vs. MNT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, which is greater than MNT.TO's maximum drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and MNT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPLMNT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.80%

-45.44%

-36.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-25.65%

+11.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.36%

-25.65%

-7.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

-25.65%

-7.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

-32.69%

-5.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.33%

-25.64%

+21.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.60%

-23.40%

-6.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.48%

10.24%

-4.76%

Volatility

AAPL vs. MNT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Apple Inc (AAPL) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) at 4.88%. This indicates that AAPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPLMNT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

4.88%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.99%

25.41%

-9.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.41%

30.90%

-8.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.47%

21.25%

+6.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.91%

20.39%

+8.52%

Dividends

AAPL vs. MNT.TO - Dividend Comparison

AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while MNT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.35%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
MNT.TO
Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPL and MNT.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPL and MNT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer