AAPL vs. HAL
AAPL (Apple Inc) and HAL (Halliburton Company) are both stocks. AAPL operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology), while HAL operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy). Over the past 10 years, AAPL returned 29.63%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for HAL. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AAPL vs. HAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly lower than HAL's 44.62% return. Over the past 10 years, AAPL has outperformed HAL with an annualized return of 29.63%, while HAL has yielded a comparatively lower 1.02% annualized return.
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 48.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.11%
- 5Y*
- 19.46%
- 10Y*
- 29.63%
HAL
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 44.62%
- 6M
- 45.55%
- 1Y
- 101.95%
- 3Y*
- 10.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.92%
- 10Y*
- 1.02%
AAPL vs. HAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 11.12% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
HAL Halliburton Company | 44.62% | 7.02% | -23.19% | -6.47% | 74.45% | 21.99% | -21.23% | -4.90% | -44.63% | -8.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPL and HAL is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 1980 | 0.20 |
The correlation between AAPL and HAL shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AAPL:
$4.45T
HAL:
$33.98B
AAPL:
$8.24
HAL:
$1.82
AAPL:
36.61
HAL:
22.29
AAPL:
4.82
HAL:
3.56
AAPL:
9.94
HAL:
1.55
AAPL:
41.82
HAL:
3.14
AAPL:
$451.44B
HAL:
$22.17B
AAPL:
$216.07B
HAL:
$3.40B
AAPL:
$153.63B
HAL:
$3.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPL vs. HAL — Risk / Return Rank
AAPL
HAL
AAPL vs. HAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and Halliburton Company (HAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPL | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.42 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 7.82 | -4.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.89 | 20.24 | -11.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPL | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 2.78 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.32 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | 0.02 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.14 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
AAPL vs. HAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, smaller than the maximum HAL drawdown of -92.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and HAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPL | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.80% | -92.99% | +11.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -13.10% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.36% | -54.01% | +20.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.36% | -54.01% | +20.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.52% | -91.45% | +52.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.33% | -31.36% | +27.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.60% | -39.13% | +9.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.48% | 5.06% | +0.42% |
Volatility
AAPL vs. HAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Apple Inc (AAPL) is 5.68%, while Halliburton Company (HAL) has a volatility of 10.08%. This indicates that AAPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPL | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.68% | 10.08% | -4.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.99% | 24.20% | -8.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.41% | 36.99% | -14.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.47% | 40.19% | -12.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.91% | 45.98% | -17.07% |
Dividends
AAPL vs. HAL - Dividend Comparison
AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than HAL's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
HAL Halliburton Company | 1.68% | 2.41% | 2.50% | 1.77% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 1.67% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 2.12% |
Financials
AAPL vs. HAL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apple Inc and Halliburton Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AAPL vs. HAL - Profitability Comparison
AAPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.
HAL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 790.00M and revenue of 5.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.6%.
AAPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.
HAL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 679.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.
AAPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.
HAL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 461.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPL and HAL have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAL has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to AAPL (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPL dropped -81.80% vs HAL's -92.99%.
HAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPL and HAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer