AA vs. GTX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

AA (Alcoa Corporation) and GTX (Garrett Motion Inc.) are both stocks. AA operates in Aluminum (Basic Materials), while GTX operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, AA returned 15.22%/yr vs 33.47%/yr for GTX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AA vs. GTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alcoa Corporation (AA) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AA achieves a 38.65% return, which is significantly lower than GTX's 86.21% return.

AA

• 1D: 2.16%
• 1M: 16.43%
• YTD: 38.65%
• 6M: 65.72%
• 1Y: 164.65%
• 3Y*: 29.24%
• 5Y*: 15.22%
• 10Y*: —

GTX

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 11.48%
• YTD: 86.21%
• 6M: 97.18%
• 1Y: 221.55%
• 3Y*: 62.84%
• 5Y*: 33.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AA vs. GTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AA Alcoa Corporation	38.65%	42.46%	12.43%	-24.33%	-23.12%	159.05%	7.16%	-19.07%	-37.88%
GTX Garrett Motion Inc.	86.21%	97.23%	-6.62%	26.90%	-5.11%	81.26%	-55.66%	-19.04%	-43.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AA and GTX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2018	0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap AA : $19.36B GTX : $6.23B
EPS AA : $3.92 GTX : $1.72
PE Ratio AA : 18.74 GTX : 18.76
PEG Ratio AA : 0.05 GTX : 0.15
PS Ratio AA : 1.52 GTX : 2.38
Total Revenue (TTM) AA : $12.66B GTX : $2.71B
Gross Profit (TTM) AA : $948.00M GTX : $855.00M
EBITDA (TTM) AA : $1.70B GTX : $452.00M

Return for Risk

AA vs. GTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AA

AA Risk / Return Rank: 95
AA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AA Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AA Omega Ratio Rank: 90
AA Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AA Martin Ratio Rank: 97

GTX

GTX Risk / Return Rank: 98
GTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
GTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
GTX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
GTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
GTX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AA vs. GTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alcoa Corporation (AA) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AA	GTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.11	4.67	-1.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	6.57	-3.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.79	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.49	11.22	-0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.51	36.36	-10.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AA vs. GTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AA Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is lower than the GTX Sharpe Ratio of 4.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AA and GTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AA	GTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.11	4.67	-1.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.81	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.12	+0.13

Drawdowns

AA vs. GTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AA drawdown since its inception was -90.90%, roughly equal to the maximum GTX drawdown of -93.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AA and GTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AA	GTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.90%	-93.08%	+2.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.80%	-19.87%	+4.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.25%	-26.82%	-25.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.46%	-31.66%	-43.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.12%	-4.63%	-14.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.18%	-50.96%	+4.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.48%	6.12%	+0.36%

Volatility

AA vs. GTX - Volatility Comparison

Alcoa Corporation (AA) has a higher volatility of 18.33% compared to Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) at 14.68%. This indicates that AA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AA	GTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.33%	14.68%	+3.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.63%	34.96%	+4.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.40%	47.87%	+5.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.08%	41.53%	+14.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.59%	63.96%	-8.37%

Dividends

AA vs. GTX - Dividend Comparison

AA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than GTX's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AA Alcoa Corporation	0.54%	0.75%	1.06%	1.18%	0.88%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.32%
GTX Garrett Motion Inc.	0.93%	1.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AA and GTX in my portfolio?

AA and GTX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AA or GTX?

AA has higher volatility (18.33%) compared to GTX (14.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AA dropped -90.90% vs GTX's -93.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.67 vs 3.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.