PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AA vs. GDXU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AA vs. GDXU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alcoa Corporation (AA) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AA achieves a 38.65% return, which is significantly higher than GDXU's -57.47% return.


AA

1D
2.16%
1M
16.43%
YTD
38.65%
6M
65.72%
1Y
164.65%
3Y*
29.24%
5Y*
15.22%
10Y*

GDXU

1D
-0.54%
1M
-49.20%
YTD
-57.47%
6M
-46.20%
1Y
38.54%
3Y*
35.00%
5Y*
-14.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AA vs. GDXU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AA
Alcoa Corporation
38.65%42.46%12.43%-24.33%-23.12%159.05%4.58%
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040
-57.47%796.47%-18.60%-21.36%-62.82%-54.93%4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between AA and GDXU is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AA vs. GDXU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AA
AA Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AA Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AA Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXU
GDXU Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GDXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXU Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AA vs. GDXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alcoa Corporation (AA) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAGDXUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.18

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.49

0.48

+10.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.51

1.04

+24.47

AA vs. GDXU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AA Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is higher than the GDXU Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AA and GDXU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAGDXUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11

0.28

+2.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

-0.13

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

-0.13

+0.37

Drawdowns

AA vs. GDXU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AA drawdown since its inception was -90.90%, roughly equal to the maximum GDXU drawdown of -94.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AA and GDXU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAGDXUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.90%

-94.39%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.80%

-80.26%

+64.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.25%

-80.26%

+28.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.46%

-92.93%

+17.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.12%

-80.26%

+61.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.18%

-69.78%

+23.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.48%

37.20%

-30.72%

Volatility

AA vs. GDXU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alcoa Corporation (AA) is 18.33%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a volatility of 50.50%. This indicates that AA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAGDXUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.33%

50.50%

-32.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.63%

122.03%

-82.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.40%

140.25%

-86.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.08%

111.49%

-55.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.59%

110.52%

-54.93%

Dividends

AA vs. GDXU - Dividend Comparison

AA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while GDXU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AA
Alcoa Corporation
0.54%0.75%1.06%1.18%0.88%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.32%
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AA and GDXU have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXU has higher volatility (50.50%) compared to AA (18.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AA dropped -90.90% vs GDXU's -94.39%.

AA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AA and GDXU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer