PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5MVL.DE vs. SEML.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

5MVL.DE vs. SEML.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

5MVL.DE is traded in EUR, while SEML.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SEML.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5MVL.DE achieves a 45.83% return, which is significantly higher than SEML.L's 1.31% return.


5MVL.DE

1D
-2.48%
1M
8.30%
YTD
45.83%
6M
47.62%
1Y
80.78%
3Y*
33.99%
5Y*
17.27%
10Y*

SEML.L

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.31%
6M
1.75%
1Y
6.39%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
1.84%
10Y*
2.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5MVL.DE vs. SEML.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
5MVL.DE
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)
45.83%27.25%21.00%14.58%-10.54%13.07%-2.40%20.39%-2.61%
SEML.L
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF
1.31%4.56%3.57%7.65%-5.38%-3.59%-6.90%15.09%-0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between 5MVL.DE and SEML.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2018

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

5MVL.DE vs. SEML.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5MVL.DE
5MVL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
5MVL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SEML.L
SEML.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SEML.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEML.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEML.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SEML.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEML.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5MVL.DE vs. SEML.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


5MVL.DESEML.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.20

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.86

1.63

+7.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.83

5.43

+23.41

5MVL.DE vs. SEML.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5MVL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 4.31, which is higher than the SEML.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5MVL.DE and SEML.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


5MVL.DESEML.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31

1.13

+3.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.26

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

-0.06

+0.89

Drawdowns

5MVL.DE vs. SEML.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5MVL.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.25%, smaller than the maximum SEML.L drawdown of -41.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5MVL.DE and SEML.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


5MVL.DESEML.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.25%

-41.37%

+9.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-3.92%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

-7.68%

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.60%

-10.13%

-10.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.88%

-11.24%

+7.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-23.78%

+17.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

1.17%

+1.70%

Volatility

5MVL.DE vs. SEML.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.71% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) at 1.68%. This indicates that 5MVL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEML.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


5MVL.DESEML.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.71%

1.68%

+7.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.83%

4.38%

+11.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.13%

5.62%

+13.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

7.19%

+9.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

8.72%

+10.12%

5MVL.DE vs. SEML.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

5MVL.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SEML.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

5MVL.DE vs. SEML.L - Dividend Comparison

5MVL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.89%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
5MVL.DE
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEML.L
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF
6.89%5.44%5.56%5.05%5.25%4.58%5.13%5.44%7.30%6.75%6.78%5.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


5MVL.DE and SEML.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 5MVL.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

5MVL.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SEML.L.

5MVL.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SEML.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. 5MVL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Select Value Factor Focus, while SEML.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for 5MVL.DE and 0.50% for SEML.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 5MVL.DE and SEML.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer