5MVL.DE vs. DBZB.DE
5MVL.DE (iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)) and DBZB.DE (Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - 5MVL.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Select Value Factor Focus, while DBZB.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the FTSE World Government Bond - Developed Markets (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 5MVL.DE returned 17.27%/yr vs -2.54%/yr for DBZB.DE. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. 5MVL.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DBZB.DE.
Performance
5MVL.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 5MVL.DE achieves a 45.83% return, which is significantly higher than DBZB.DE's -0.71% return.
5MVL.DE
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 45.83%
- 6M
- 47.62%
- 1Y
- 80.78%
- 3Y*
- 33.99%
- 5Y*
- 17.27%
- 10Y*
- —
DBZB.DE
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- -0.77%
- 1Y
- 0.09%
- 3Y*
- 0.76%
- 5Y*
- -2.54%
- 10Y*
- -0.99%
5MVL.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5MVL.DE iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) | 45.83% | 27.25% | 21.00% | 14.58% | -10.54% | 13.07% | -2.40% | 20.39% | -2.61% |
DBZB.DE Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged | -0.71% | 1.28% | -0.41% | 3.56% | -15.11% | -3.19% | 4.16% | 4.55% | 0.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between 5MVL.DE and DBZB.DE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2018 | -0.05 |
The correlation between 5MVL.DE and DBZB.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
5MVL.DE vs. DBZB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
5MVL.DE
DBZB.DE
5MVL.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE) and Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (DBZB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 5MVL.DE | DBZB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.73 | 1.00 | +0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.86 | -0.01 | +8.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.83 | -0.04 | +28.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 5MVL.DE | DBZB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.31 | -0.01 | +4.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | -0.47 | +1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.22 | +0.61 |
Drawdowns
5MVL.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 5MVL.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.25%, which is greater than DBZB.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5MVL.DE and DBZB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 5MVL.DE | DBZB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.25% | -21.88% | -10.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -3.52% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.15% | -5.14% | -14.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.60% | -19.51% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.88% | -16.44% | +12.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -5.97% | -0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 1.26% | +1.61% |
Volatility
5MVL.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.71% compared to Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (DBZB.DE) at 1.48%. This indicates that 5MVL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBZB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 5MVL.DE | DBZB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.71% | 1.48% | +7.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.83% | 3.06% | +12.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.13% | 3.86% | +15.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 5.37% | +11.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 4.74% | +14.10% |
5MVL.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
5MVL.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DBZB.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
5MVL.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 5MVL.DE nor DBZB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
5MVL.DE and DBZB.DE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBZB.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBZB.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 5MVL.DE.
5MVL.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DBZB.DE is Global Bonds. 5MVL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Select Value Factor Focus, while DBZB.DE tracks FTSE World Government Bond - Developed Markets (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for 5MVL.DE and 0.25% for DBZB.DE.
Find the right allocation for 5MVL.DE and DBZB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer