4GLD.DE vs. SEML.L
4GLD.DE (Xetra-Gold) and SEML.L (iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - 4GLD.DE is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while SEML.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, 4GLD.DE returned 13.36%/yr vs 2.07%/yr for SEML.L. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 4GLD.DE charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SEML.L.
Performance
4GLD.DE vs. SEML.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
4GLD.DE is traded in EUR, while SEML.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SEML.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 4GLD.DE achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly higher than SEML.L's 1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, 4GLD.DE has outperformed SEML.L with an annualized return of 13.36%, while SEML.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.07% annualized return.
4GLD.DE
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 6.64%
- 1Y
- 31.48%
- 3Y*
- 28.18%
- 5Y*
- 19.85%
- 10Y*
- 13.36%
SEML.L
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 1.31%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 6.39%
- 3Y*
- 3.73%
- 5Y*
- 1.84%
- 10Y*
- 2.07%
4GLD.DE vs. SEML.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4GLD.DE Xetra-Gold | 2.80% | 49.32% | 34.57% | 9.32% | 7.12% | 4.03% | 13.05% | 21.25% | 3.20% | -1.67% |
SEML.L iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF | 1.31% | 4.56% | 3.57% | 7.65% | -5.38% | -3.59% | -6.90% | 15.09% | -1.20% | 0.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between 4GLD.DE and SEML.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2011 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
4GLD.DE vs. SEML.L — Risk / Return Rank
4GLD.DE
SEML.L
4GLD.DE vs. SEML.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 4GLD.DE | SEML.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.20 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 1.63 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.63 | 5.43 | -0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 4GLD.DE | SEML.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 1.13 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 0.26 | +0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | 0.24 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | -0.06 | +0.71 |
Drawdowns
4GLD.DE vs. SEML.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, smaller than the maximum SEML.L drawdown of -41.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4GLD.DE and SEML.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 4GLD.DE | SEML.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.79% | -41.37% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.54% | -3.92% | -12.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.54% | -7.68% | -8.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.54% | -10.13% | -6.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.23% | -19.93% | +1.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.95% | -11.24% | -3.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.83% | -23.78% | +11.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.52% | 1.17% | +5.35% |
Volatility
4GLD.DE vs. SEML.L - Volatility Comparison
Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) at 1.68%. This indicates that 4GLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEML.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 4GLD.DE | SEML.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 1.68% | +3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.09% | 4.38% | +15.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.06% | 5.62% | +17.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 7.19% | +8.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.37% | 8.72% | +5.65% |
4GLD.DE vs. SEML.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
4GLD.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SEML.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
4GLD.DE vs. SEML.L - Dividend Comparison
4GLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4GLD.DE Xetra-Gold | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEML.L iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF | 6.89% | 5.44% | 5.56% | 5.05% | 5.25% | 4.58% | 5.13% | 5.44% | 7.30% | 6.75% | 6.78% | 5.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
4GLD.DE and SEML.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SEML.L.
4GLD.DE is categorized as Gold, while SEML.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. 4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price, while SEML.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Börse Commodities and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for 4GLD.DE and 0.50% for SEML.L.
Find the right allocation for 4GLD.DE and SEML.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer