4GLD.DE vs. AVWS.DE
4GLD.DE (Xetra-Gold) and AVWS.DE (Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - 4GLD.DE is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while AVWS.DE is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. 4GLD.DE is passively managed, while AVWS.DE is actively managed. Over the past year, 4GLD.DE returned 27.88% vs 34.17% for AVWS.DE. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 4GLD.DE charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for AVWS.DE.
Performance
4GLD.DE vs. AVWS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 4GLD.DE achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than AVWS.DE's 18.42% return.
4GLD.DE
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 3.79%
- 1Y
- 27.88%
- 3Y*
- 27.05%
- 5Y*
- 19.19%
- 10Y*
- 12.76%
AVWS.DE
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 18.42%
- 6M
- 17.61%
- 1Y
- 34.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
4GLD.DE vs. AVWS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
4GLD.DE Xetra-Gold | -0.02% | 49.32% | 4.48% |
AVWS.DE Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR | 18.42% | 7.86% | 5.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between 4GLD.DE and AVWS.DE is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
4GLD.DE vs. AVWS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
4GLD.DE
AVWS.DE
4GLD.DE vs. AVWS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) and Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR (AVWS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 4GLD.DE | AVWS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.41 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 5.38 | -3.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.17 | 19.94 | -15.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 4GLD.DE | AVWS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 2.36 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 1.10 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
4GLD.DE vs. AVWS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, which is greater than AVWS.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4GLD.DE and AVWS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 4GLD.DE | AVWS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.79% | -25.20% | -11.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.28% | -6.37% | -10.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.28% | -0.31% | -16.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -5.10% | -6.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.78% | 1.71% | +5.07% |
Volatility
4GLD.DE vs. AVWS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR (AVWS.DE) at 3.26%. This indicates that 4GLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVWS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 4GLD.DE | AVWS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | 3.26% | +1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.23% | 9.60% | +10.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.20% | 14.50% | +8.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 18.25% | -2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.49% | 18.25% | -3.76% |
4GLD.DE vs. AVWS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
4GLD.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than AVWS.DE's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
4GLD.DE vs. AVWS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 4GLD.DE nor AVWS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
4GLD.DE and AVWS.DE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for AVWS.DE.
4GLD.DE is categorized as Gold, while AVWS.DE is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Börse Commodities and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for 4GLD.DE and 0.39% for AVWS.DE.
Find the right allocation for 4GLD.DE and AVWS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer