PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^TNX vs. PCLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^TNX vs. PCLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^TNX achieves a 9.34% return, which is significantly lower than PCLIX's 32.85% return. Over the past 10 years, ^TNX has underperformed PCLIX with an annualized return of 10.75%, while PCLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.65% annualized return.


^TNX

1D
0.35%
1M
4.31%
YTD
9.34%
6M
9.11%
1Y
0.93%
3Y*
6.72%
5Y*
25.04%
10Y*
10.75%

PCLIX

1D
-1.74%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
32.85%
6M
32.08%
1Y
40.17%
3Y*
17.20%
5Y*
15.90%
10Y*
11.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^TNX vs. PCLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^TNX
Treasury Yield 10 Years
9.34%-8.97%18.29%-0.34%156.55%64.89%-52.21%-28.56%11.68%-1.68%
PCLIX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
32.85%5.76%8.53%0.69%23.32%43.83%-9.18%19.37%-12.02%10.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ^TNX and PCLIX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2010

0.21

The correlation between ^TNX and PCLIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (5 years) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^TNX vs. PCLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^TNX
^TNX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
^TNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^TNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
^TNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
^TNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
^TNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

PCLIX
PCLIX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PCLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
PCLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^TNX vs. PCLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^TNXPCLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.38

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

5.58

-5.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.14

15.10

-14.96

^TNX vs. PCLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^TNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the PCLIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^TNX and PCLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^TNXPCLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

2.13

-2.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.82

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.29

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.17

-0.20

Drawdowns

^TNX vs. PCLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^TNX drawdown since its inception was -96.85%, which is greater than PCLIX's maximum drawdown of -66.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^TNX and PCLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^TNXPCLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.85%

-66.60%

-30.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.94%

-7.46%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.41%

-12.30%

-15.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.41%

-21.59%

-5.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.57%

-51.78%

-32.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.26%

-7.46%

-63.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.00%

-24.14%

-30.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.98%

2.75%

+4.23%

Volatility

^TNX vs. PCLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) is 4.91%, while PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) has a volatility of 6.14%. This indicates that ^TNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^TNXPCLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

6.14%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

17.05%

-6.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.21%

19.56%

-4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.40%

19.42%

+12.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.99%

40.54%

+7.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


^TNX and PCLIX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCLIX has higher volatility (6.14%) compared to ^TNX (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^TNX dropped -96.85% vs PCLIX's -66.60%.

PCLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^TNX and PCLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer