PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^RTSI vs. CACX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^RTSI vs. CACX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RTS Index (^RTSI) and Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

^RTSI is traded in USD, while CACX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CACX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^RTSI achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than CACX.L's 1.48% return. Over the past 10 years, ^RTSI has underperformed CACX.L with an annualized return of 2.17%, while CACX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.67% annualized return.


^RTSI

1D
-1.70%
1M
1.53%
YTD
0.37%
6M
-0.37%
1Y
0.87%
3Y*
2.07%
5Y*
-7.45%
10Y*
2.17%

CACX.L

1D
0.12%
1M
0.19%
YTD
1.48%
6M
3.00%
1Y
9.72%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
10.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^RTSI vs. CACX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^RTSI
RTS Index
0.37%24.73%-17.56%11.63%-39.18%15.01%-10.42%44.93%-7.42%0.18%
CACX.L
Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
1.48%28.62%-5.98%23.00%-11.19%21.03%3.87%31.09%-10.56%30.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ^RTSI and CACX.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.38

The correlation between ^RTSI and CACX.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^RTSI vs. CACX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^RTSI
^RTSI Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
^RTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^RTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
^RTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
^RTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
^RTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CACX.L
CACX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CACX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CACX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CACX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CACX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
CACX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^RTSI vs. CACX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RTS Index (^RTSI) and Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^RTSICACX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.12

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

0.76

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.15

2.33

-2.48

^RTSI vs. CACX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^RTSI Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the CACX.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^RTSI and CACX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^RTSICACX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

0.59

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

0.32

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

0.53

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.05

+0.16

Drawdowns

^RTSI vs. CACX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^RTSI drawdown since its inception was -93.26%, which is greater than CACX.L's maximum drawdown of -68.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^RTSI and CACX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^RTSICACX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.26%

-68.54%

-24.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.79%

-12.77%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.03%

-15.17%

-24.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.14%

-32.43%

-29.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.14%

-40.03%

-22.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.05%

-4.77%

-50.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.30%

-33.24%

-10.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.17%

4.16%

+4.01%

Volatility

^RTSI vs. CACX.L - Volatility Comparison

RTS Index (^RTSI) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) at 3.91%. This indicates that ^RTSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CACX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^RTSICACX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

3.91%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.81%

12.59%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.07%

16.39%

+4.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.06%

19.89%

+16.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.01%

20.20%

+10.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


^RTSI and CACX.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^RTSI and CACX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer