^N225 vs. CACX.L
^N225 (Nikkei 225) is an index, while CACX.L (Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) is Europe Equities fund tracking the Euronext Paris CAC 40 NR EUR. Over the past 10 years, ^N225 returned 14.49%/yr vs 15.24%/yr for CACX.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
^N225 vs. CACX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
^N225 is traded in JPY, while CACX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CACX.L values have been converted to JPY using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ^N225 achieves a 27.57% return, which is significantly higher than CACX.L's 3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ^N225 has underperformed CACX.L with an annualized return of 14.49%, while CACX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.24% annualized return.
^N225
- 1D
- -3.56%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 27.57%
- 6M
- 26.96%
- 1Y
- 70.16%
- 3Y*
- 25.79%
- 5Y*
- 17.27%
- 10Y*
- 14.49%
CACX.L
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 5.84%
- 1Y
- 21.39%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- 14.85%
- 10Y*
- 15.24%
^N225 vs. CACX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
^N225 Nikkei 225 | 27.57% | 26.18% | 19.22% | 28.24% | -9.37% | 4.91% | 16.01% | 18.20% | -12.08% | 19.10% |
CACX.L Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 3.66% | 28.24% | 4.91% | 32.27% | 1.16% | 34.91% | -1.26% | 29.82% | -12.91% | 25.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between ^N225 and CACX.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^N225 vs. CACX.L — Risk / Return Rank
^N225
CACX.L
^N225 vs. CACX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nikkei 225 (^N225) and Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ^N225 | CACX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.25 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.46 | 1.95 | +3.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.16 | 6.32 | +12.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ^N225 | CACX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | 1.37 | +1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.72 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.69 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.13 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
^N225 vs. CACX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^N225 drawdown since its inception was -81.87%, which is greater than CACX.L's maximum drawdown of -73.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^N225 and CACX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^N225 | CACX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.87% | -73.35% | -8.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.23% | -10.94% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.26% | -18.58% | -7.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.26% | -22.58% | -3.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.80% | -41.18% | +9.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.11% | -2.19% | -3.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.65% | -35.32% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 3.38% | +0.33% |
Volatility
^N225 vs. CACX.L - Volatility Comparison
Nikkei 225 (^N225) has a higher volatility of 8.16% compared to Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) at 3.69%. This indicates that ^N225's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CACX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^N225 | CACX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 3.69% | +4.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.30% | 11.57% | +8.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.01% | 15.63% | +9.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 20.63% | +1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 21.94% | -1.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
^N225 and CACX.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ^N225 and CACX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer