PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^GSPC vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^GSPC vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^GSPC achieves a 8.18% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -4.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ^GSPC having a 13.45% annualized return and SLV not far ahead at 14.08%.


^GSPC

1D
0.30%
1M
0.09%
YTD
8.18%
6M
8.17%
1Y
23.42%
3Y*
19.88%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*
13.45%

SLV

1D
0.02%
1M
-15.66%
YTD
-4.41%
6M
16.83%
1Y
88.38%
3Y*
40.36%
5Y*
19.02%
10Y*
14.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^GSPC vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
8.18%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-4.41%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ^GSPC and SLV is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^GSPC vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^GSPC vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^GSPCSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.30

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

2.09

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.84

4.40

+7.44

^GSPC vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^GSPC and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^GSPCSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.50

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.53

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.44

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.23

+0.24

Drawdowns

^GSPC vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^GSPC drawdown since its inception was -56.78%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^GSPC and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^GSPCSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.78%

-76.28%

+19.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-42.45%

+33.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-42.45%

+23.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.43%

-42.45%

+17.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

-42.81%

+8.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-41.69%

+39.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.72%

-44.67%

+33.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

20.15%

-18.17%

Volatility

^GSPC vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) is 3.80%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.89%. This indicates that ^GSPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^GSPCSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

16.89%

-13.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.41%

58.88%

-49.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

59.53%

-47.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

36.33%

-19.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

31.92%

-13.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


^GSPC and SLV have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.89%) compared to ^GSPC (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^GSPC dropped -56.78% vs SLV's -76.28%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^GSPC and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer