^GSPC vs. NASDX
^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index, while NASDX (Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, ^GSPC returned 13.45%/yr vs 21.88%/yr for NASDX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
^GSPC vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ^GSPC achieves a 8.18% return, which is significantly lower than NASDX's 14.68% return. Over the past 10 years, ^GSPC has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 13.45%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.88% annualized return.
^GSPC
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 8.17%
- 1Y
- 23.42%
- 3Y*
- 19.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
NASDX
- 1D
- -4.76%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- 14.68%
- 6M
- 13.19%
- 1Y
- 33.57%
- 3Y*
- 30.14%
- 5Y*
- 18.65%
- 10Y*
- 21.88%
^GSPC vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 8.18% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 24.23% | -19.44% | 26.89% | 16.26% | 28.88% | -6.24% | 19.42% |
NASDX Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares | 14.68% | 21.00% | 36.91% | 54.69% | -32.57% | 27.32% | 48.59% | 38.22% | -1.21% | 31.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between ^GSPC and NASDX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2000 | 0.88 |
The correlation between ^GSPC and NASDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^GSPC vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank
^GSPC
NASDX
^GSPC vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ^GSPC | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.37 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 2.95 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.84 | 11.38 | +0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ^GSPC | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 2.09 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.81 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.97 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.32 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
^GSPC vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^GSPC drawdown since its inception was -56.78%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^GSPC and NASDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^GSPC | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.78% | -83.16% | +26.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.10% | -11.90% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.90% | -22.71% | +3.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.43% | -35.33% | +9.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.92% | -35.33% | +1.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -5.52% | +2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.72% | -34.36% | +23.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 3.08% | -1.10% |
Volatility
^GSPC vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) is 3.80%, while Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that ^GSPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^GSPC | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 6.67% | -2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.41% | 13.18% | -3.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 16.82% | -4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 23.13% | -6.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 22.72% | -4.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, ^GSPC and NASDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
NASDX has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to ^GSPC (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^GSPC dropped -56.78% vs NASDX's -83.16%.
NASDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ^GSPC and NASDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer